日韩性视频-久久久蜜桃-www中文字幕-在线中文字幕av-亚洲欧美一区二区三区四区-撸久久-香蕉视频一区-久久无码精品丰满人妻-国产高潮av-激情福利社-日韩av网址大全-国产精品久久999-日本五十路在线-性欧美在线-久久99精品波多结衣一区-男女午夜免费视频-黑人极品ⅴideos精品欧美棵-人人妻人人澡人人爽精品欧美一区-日韩一区在线看-欧美a级在线免费观看

歡迎訪問 生活随笔!

生活随笔

當前位置: 首頁 > 编程资源 > 编程问答 >内容正文

编程问答

NXP iMX8系列处理器核心性能对比测试

發布時間:2023/12/10 编程问答 42 豆豆
生活随笔 收集整理的這篇文章主要介紹了 NXP iMX8系列处理器核心性能对比测试 小編覺得挺不錯的,現在分享給大家,幫大家做個參考.

By Toradex秦海

1).?簡介

NXP iMX8系列ARM處理器是NXP近幾年新發布的產品,架構均升級到了64bit的ARMv8,其中包含了iMX8,iMX8x,iMX8M Mini,iMX8M Plus等一系列處理器,其基本參數屬性的對比可以參考下面來自于NXP官網的表格,而本文就從CPU核心、GPU核心、內存性能等幾個方面對于iMX8系列的不同產品做一個簡單對比測試供參考。需要注意的是Benchmark測試無法做到絕對完整客觀,通常和軟硬件系統配置以及所采用的Benchmark工具有很大的相關性,不同配置或工具可能得出不同結論,因此本文的測試只是基于本文測試環境以及所用Benchmark工具的參考數據。

本文所采用的全部測試平臺均來自于Toradex iMX8?系列ARM核心板和對應載板。

2).?準備

a).?Apalis iMX8QM?4GB?WB IT?ARM核心版配合Ioxra?載板,連接調試串口UART1(載板X22)到開發主機方便調試。

b).?Colibri iMX8QXP 2GB WB IT?ARM核心板配合Colibri Evaluation Board載板,連接調試串口UART1(載板X27)到開發主機方便調試。

c).?Verdin iMX8M Mini Quad 2GB WB IT?ARM核心板配合Verdin Development Board?載板,連接調試串口UART1(載板X66)到開發主機方便調試。

d).?Verdin iMX8M Plus Quad 4GB WB IT?ARM核心板配合Verdin Development Board?載板,連接調試串口UART1(載板X66)到開發主機方便調試。

3).?預設軟件測試環境

a).?所有測試模塊均更新為Toradex?Ycoto Linux Reference Multimedia Image?5.3.0 Quarterly?版本。

b).?參考這里的說明在Linux下將所有測試模塊的CPU核心工作模式設置為?”performance”,也就是持續運行在最高主頻。

-------------------------------

$ echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/<cpux>/cpufreq/scaling_governor

-------------------------------

4).?CPU單核性能對比測試

a).?測試工具軟件?nbench,測試Linux BSP自帶

b).?測試方法

-------------------------------

###?進入/usr/bin目錄,因為測試需要NNET.DAT這個文件

$ cd /usr/bin

###?對于Apalis iMX8QM,分別測試A72核心和A53核心

$?taskset -c 4,5 nbench?&& taskset -c 0-3 nbench

###?對于其他模塊

$ nbench

-------------------------------

c).?測試結果

./ Apalis iMX8QM A72

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:/usr/bin# taskset -c 4,5 nbench

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)

Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)

Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST ???????????????: Iterations/sec. ?: Old Index ??: New Index

????????????????????: ?????????????????: Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*

--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------

NUMERIC SORT ???????: ??????????695.3 ?: ?????17.83 ?: ??????5.86

STRING SORT ????????: ?????????345.36 ?: ????154.32 ?: ?????23.89

BITFIELD ???????????: ?????2.2166e+08 ?: ?????38.02 ?: ??????7.94

FP EMULATION ???????: ?????????198.55 ?: ?????95.27 ?: ?????21.98

FOURIER ????????????: ??????????47074 ?: ?????53.54 ?: ?????30.07

ASSIGNMENT ?????????: ?????????23.827 ?: ?????90.67 ?: ?????23.52

IDEA ???????????????: ?????????6381.3 ?: ?????97.60 ?: ?????28.98

HUFFMAN ????????????: ?????????1921.2 ?: ?????53.27 ?: ?????17.01

NEURAL NET ?????????: ?????????19.353 ?: ?????31.09 ?: ?????13.08

LU DECOMPOSITION ???: ?????????1125.2 ?: ?????58.29 ?: ?????42.09

==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================

INTEGER INDEX ??????: 64.608

FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 45.949

Baseline (MSDOS*) ??: Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0

-------------------------------

./ Apalis iMX8QM A53

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:/usr/bin# taskset -c 0-3 nbench ???????????????????????????????????????????????????

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)

Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)

Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST ???????????????: Iterations/sec. ?: Old Index ??: New Index

????????????????????: ?????????????????: Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*

--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------

NUMERIC SORT ???????: ?????????432.04 ?: ?????11.08 ?: ??????3.64

STRING SORT ????????: ?????????142.03 ?: ?????63.46 ?: ??????9.82

BITFIELD ???????????: ?????1.8588e+08 ?: ?????31.88 ?: ??????6.66

FP EMULATION ???????: ?????????94.362 ?: ?????45.28 ?: ?????10.45

FOURIER ????????????: ??????????19599 ?: ?????22.29 ?: ?????12.52

ASSIGNMENT ?????????: ?????????11.424 ?: ?????43.47 ?: ?????11.28

IDEA ???????????????: ?????????2943.3 ?: ?????45.02 ?: ?????13.37

HUFFMAN ????????????: ?????????998.72 ?: ?????27.69 ?: ??????8.84

NEURAL NET ?????????: ?????????6.9556 ?: ?????11.17 ?: ??????4.70

LU DECOMPOSITION ???: ?????????462.88 ?: ?????23.98 ?: ?????17.32

==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================

INTEGER INDEX ??????: 34.226

FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 18.143

Baseline (MSDOS*) ??: Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0

-------------------------------

./ Colibri iMX8X A35

-------------------------------

TEST ???????????????: Iterations/sec. ?: Old Index ??: New Index

????????????????????: ?????????????????: Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*

--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------

NUMERIC SORT ???????: ?????????370.76 ?: ??????9.51 ?: ??????3.12

STRING SORT ????????: ?????????103.29 ?: ?????46.15 ?: ??????7.14

BITFIELD ???????????: ?????1.3321e+08 ?: ?????22.85 ?: ??????4.77

FP EMULATION ???????: ?????????70.273 ?: ?????33.72 ?: ??????7.78

FOURIER ????????????: ??????????16962 ?: ?????19.29 ?: ?????10.83

ASSIGNMENT ?????????: ?????????9.5353 ?: ?????36.28 ?: ??????9.41

IDEA ???????????????: ?????????2319.5 ?: ?????35.48 ?: ?????10.53

HUFFMAN ????????????: ?????????814.55 ?: ?????22.59 ?: ??????7.21

NEURAL NET ?????????: ?????????5.9326 ?: ??????9.53 ?: ??????4.01

LU DECOMPOSITION ???: ?????????408.75 ?: ?????21.18 ?: ?????15.29

==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================

INTEGER INDEX ??????: 26.762

FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 15.731

Baseline (MSDOS*) ??: Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Mini A53

-------------------------------

TEST ???????????????: Iterations/sec. ?: Old Index ??: New Index

????????????????????: ?????????????????: Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*

--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------

NUMERIC SORT ???????: ?????????576.19 ?: ?????14.78 ?: ??????4.85

STRING SORT ????????: ?????????189.54 ?: ?????84.69 ?: ?????13.11

BITFIELD ???????????: ?????2.4316e+08 ?: ?????41.71 ?: ??????8.71

FP EMULATION ???????: ??????????125.9 ?: ?????60.41 ?: ?????13.94

FOURIER ????????????: ??????????26154 ?: ?????29.74 ?: ?????16.71

ASSIGNMENT ?????????: ?????????15.263 ?: ?????58.08 ?: ?????15.06

IDEA ???????????????: ???????????3927 ?: ?????60.06 ?: ?????17.83

HUFFMAN ????????????: ?????????1332.7 ?: ?????36.96 ?: ?????11.80

NEURAL NET ?????????: ?????????9.2744 ?: ?????14.90 ?: ??????6.27

LU DECOMPOSITION ???: ?????????621.37 ?: ?????32.19 ?: ?????23.24

==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================

INTEGER INDEX ??????: 45.545

FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 24.252

Baseline (MSDOS*) ??: Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Plus A53

-------------------------------

TEST ???????????????: Iterations/sec. ?: Old Index ??: New Index

????????????????????: ?????????????????: Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*

--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------

NUMERIC SORT ???????: ?????????576.66 ?: ?????14.79 ?: ??????4.86

STRING SORT ????????: ?????????189.55 ?: ?????84.69 ?: ?????13.11

BITFIELD ???????????: ??????2.429e+08 ?: ?????41.67 ?: ??????8.70

FP EMULATION ???????: ?????????125.89 ?: ?????60.41 ?: ?????13.94

FOURIER ????????????: ??????????26154 ?: ?????29.74 ?: ?????16.71

ASSIGNMENT ?????????: ?????????15.209 ?: ?????57.87 ?: ?????15.01

IDEA ???????????????: ?????????3927.1 ?: ?????60.06 ?: ?????17.83

HUFFMAN ????????????: ?????????1332.7 ?: ?????36.96 ?: ?????11.80

NEURAL NET ?????????: ?????????9.2744 ?: ?????14.90 ?: ??????6.27

LU DECOMPOSITION ???: ?????????615.61 ?: ?????31.89 ?: ?????23.03

==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================

INTEGER INDEX ??????: 45.520

FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 24.177

Baseline (MSDOS*) ??: Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0

-------------------------------

d).?測試結果圖表展示

5).?CPU多核性能對比測試一

a).?測試工具軟件?7zip,需通過Ycoto環境編譯

-------------------------------

### option-1 IPK package ###

### on compiling server

$ bitbake p7zip

$ scp deploy/ipk/aarch64/p7zip_16.02-r0_aarch64.ipk root@<target_device_ip_address>:/home/root/

### on target device

$ cd /home/root && opkg install p7zip_16.02-r0_aarch64.ipk

### option-2 modify conf/local.conf to include 7zip into image

IMAGE_INSTALL_append = "?p7zip"

-------------------------------

b).?測試方法

-------------------------------

###?為了將多核盡可能滿負荷,benchmark threads數量設置根據memory容量1.5或者2倍于設備CPU核心數

###?對于Apalis iMX8QM

$ 7z b -mmt12

###?對于其他模塊

$ 7z b -mmt6

-------------------------------

c).?測試結果

./ Apalis iMX8 2xA72+4xA53

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:~# 7z b -mmt12

7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21

p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)

LE

CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -

RAM size: ???3713 MB, ?# CPU hardware threads: ??6

RAM usage: ??2647 MB, ?# Benchmark threads: ????12

???????????????????????Compressing ?| ?????????????????Decompressing

Dict ????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating ?| ?????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating

?????????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS ?| ?????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS

22: ??????4431 ??528 ???817 ??4311 ?| ?????85954 ??583 ??1257 ??7331

23: ??????4342 ??540 ???819 ??4424 ?| ?????84676 ??586 ??1251 ??7326

24: ??????4534 ??576 ???846 ??4876 ?| ?????83469 ??588 ??1246 ??7326

25: ??????4478 ??580 ???882 ??5114 ?| ?????82760 ??591 ??1247 ??7365

---------------------------------- ?| ------------------------------

Avr: ????????????556 ???841 ??4681 ?| ?????????????587 ??1250 ??7337

Tot: ????????????571 ??1046 ??6009

-------------------------------

./ Colibri iMX8X 4xA35

-------------------------------

root@colibri-imx8x:~# 7z b -mmt6

7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21

p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)

LE

CPU Freq: 64000000 - - - - - - - -

RAM size: ???1775 MB, ?# CPU hardware threads: ??4

RAM usage: ??1323 MB, ?# Benchmark threads: ?????6

???????????????????????Compressing ?| ?????????????????Decompressing

Dict ????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating ?| ?????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating

?????????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS ?| ?????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS

22: ??????1885 ??362 ???506 ??1835 ?| ?????35207 ??359 ???837 ??3003

23: ??????1860 ??364 ???521 ??1896 ?| ?????36510 ??377 ???838 ??3159

24: ??????1890 ??378 ???538 ??2033 ?| ?????35043 ??368 ???836 ??3076

25: ??????1870 ??378 ???566 ??2136 ?| ?????33807 ??359 ???838 ??3009

---------------------------------- ?| ------------------------------

Avr: ????????????371 ???533 ??1975 ?| ?????????????366 ???837 ??3062

Tot: ????????????368 ???685 ??2518

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Mini 4xA53

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mm:~# 7z b -mmt6

7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21

p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)

LE

CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -

RAM size: ???1982 MB, ?# CPU hardware threads: ??4

RAM usage: ??1323 MB, ?# Benchmark threads: ?????6

???????????????????????Compressing ?| ?????????????????Decompressing

Dict ????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating ?| ?????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating

?????????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS ?| ?????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS

22: ??????2587 ??368 ???683 ??2517 ?| ?????62071 ??380 ??1393 ??5293

23: ??????2575 ??376 ???698 ??2624 ?| ?????58488 ??364 ??1389 ??5061

24: ??????2608 ??384 ???730 ??2805 ?| ?????56726 ??360 ??1384 ??4979

25: ??????2547 ??378 ???769 ??2908 ?| ?????56061 ??359 ??1390 ??4989

---------------------------------- ?| ------------------------------

Avr: ????????????377 ???720 ??2713 ?| ?????????????366 ??1389 ??5081

Tot: ????????????371 ??1054 ??3897

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Plus 4xA53

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mp:~# 7z b -mmt6

7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21

p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,4 CPUs LE)

LE

CPU Freq: 64000000 - - 64000000 - 256000000 - - -

RAM size: ???3635 MB, ?# CPU hardware threads: ??4

RAM usage: ??1323 MB, ?# Benchmark threads: ?????6

???????????????????????Compressing ?| ?????????????????Decompressing

Dict ????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating ?| ?????Speed Usage ???R/U Rating

?????????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS ?| ?????KiB/s ????% ??MIPS ??MIPS

22: ??????3100 ??377 ???801 ??3016 ?| ?????61989 ??371 ??1426 ??5286

23: ??????3035 ??375 ???824 ??3093 ?| ?????63639 ??386 ??1427 ??5507

24: ??????3035 ??379 ???862 ??3264 ?| ?????63178 ??389 ??1427 ??5545

25: ??????3004 ??377 ???910 ??3431 ?| ?????57788 ??360 ??1430 ??5143

---------------------------------- ?| ------------------------------

Avr: ????????????377 ???849 ??3201 ?| ?????????????376 ??1427 ??5370

Tot: ????????????377 ??1138 ??4286

-------------------------------

d).?測試結果圖表展示

6).?CPU多核性能對比測試二

a).?測試工具軟件?smallpt,需下載源碼編譯,詳細的下載編譯使用請參考這里

b).?測試方法

-------------------------------

###?對于Apalis iMX8QM

$ taskset -c 0-5 time ./smallpt 100

###?對于其他模塊

$ taskset -c 0-3 time ./smallpt 100

-------------------------------

c).?測試結果

./ Apalis iMX8QM 2xA72+4xA53

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:~# taskset -c 0-5 time ./smallpt 100

Rendering (100 spp) 100.00%

real ???1m 34.80s

user ???9m 23.44s

sys ????0m 0.03s

-------------------------------

./ Colibri iMX8X 4xA35

-------------------------------

root@colibri-imx8x-06748681:~# taskset -c 0-3 time ./smallpt 100 ???????????????????????????????????

Rendering (100 spp) 100.00%

real ???3m 52.67s

user ???15m 18.40s

sys ????0m 0.13s

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Mini 4xA53

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mm:~# ?taskset -c 0-3 time ./smallpt 100

Rendering (100 spp) 100.00%

real ???2m 30.11s

user ???9m 56.64s

sys ????0m 0.06s

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Plus A53

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mp:~# taskset -c 0-3 time ./smallpt 100

Rendering (100 spp) 100.00%

real ???2m 30.05s

user ???9m 56.26s

sys ????0m 0.07s

-------------------------------

d).?測試結果圖表展示

7).?內存性能測試

a).?測試工具軟件?stream,測試Linux BSP自帶。另外BSP中還有其他內存測試工具,比如tinymembench,有興趣的讀者可以自行測試。

b).?測試方法

-------------------------------

###?對于Apalis iMX8QM,分別測試A72核心和A53核心

$ taskset -c 4-5 stream && taskset -c 0-3 stream

###?對于其他模塊

$ taskset -c 0-3 stream

-------------------------------

c).?測試結果

./ Apalis iMX8QM 2xA72

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:~# taskset -c 4-5 stream

STREAM copy latency: 2.60 nanoseconds

STREAM copy bandwidth: 6159.37 MB/sec

STREAM scale latency: 2.57 nanoseconds

STREAM scale bandwidth: 6232.96 MB/sec

STREAM add latency: 4.52 nanoseconds

STREAM add bandwidth: 5312.67 MB/sec

STREAM triad latency: 4.52 nanoseconds

STREAM triad bandwidth: 5305.04 MB/sec

-------------------------------

./ Apalis iMX8QM 4xA53

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:~# taskset -c 0-3 stream ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

STREAM copy latency: 5.88 nanoseconds

STREAM copy bandwidth: 2722.48 MB/sec

STREAM scale latency: 7.44 nanoseconds

STREAM scale bandwidth: 2149.96 MB/sec

STREAM add latency: 13.36 nanoseconds

STREAM add bandwidth: 1796.68 MB/sec

STREAM triad latency: 15.41 nanoseconds

STREAM triad bandwidth: 1557.53 MB/sec

-------------------------------

./ Colibri iMX8X 4xA35

-------------------------------

root@colibri-imx8x-06748681:~# taskset -c 0-3 stream

STREAM copy latency: 5.94 nanoseconds

STREAM copy bandwidth: 2695.42 MB/sec

STREAM scale latency: 8.78 nanoseconds

STREAM scale bandwidth: 1821.91 MB/sec

STREAM add latency: 13.61 nanoseconds

STREAM add bandwidth: 1763.93 MB/sec

STREAM triad latency: 15.72 nanoseconds

STREAM triad bandwidth: 1526.23 MB/sec

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Mini 4xA53

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mm:~# ?taskset -c 0-3 stream

STREAM copy latency: 4.17 nanoseconds

STREAM copy bandwidth: 3839.23 MB/sec

STREAM scale latency: 5.46 nanoseconds

STREAM scale bandwidth: 2928.26 MB/sec

STREAM add latency: 9.13 nanoseconds

STREAM add bandwidth: 2628.41 MB/sec

STREAM triad latency: 10.70 nanoseconds

STREAM triad bandwidth: 2242.15 MB/sec

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Plus 4xA53

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mp:~# taskset -c 0-3 stream

STREAM copy latency: 3.06 nanoseconds

STREAM copy bandwidth: 5226.20 MB/sec

STREAM scale latency: 5.30 nanoseconds

STREAM scale bandwidth: 3020.58 MB/sec

STREAM add latency: 8.58 nanoseconds

STREAM add bandwidth: 2797.53 MB/sec

STREAM triad latency: 10.22 nanoseconds

STREAM triad bandwidth: 2348.11 MB/sec

-------------------------------

d).?測試結果圖表展示

8).?GPU性能測試

a).?測試工具軟件glmark2-es2-wayland,測試Linux BSP自帶。Apalis iMX8/Colibr iiMX8X連接LVDS液晶屏,分辨率為1280x800; Verdin iMX8MM/iMX8MP連接HDMI顯示器,分辨率1920x1080。

b).?測試方法

-------------------------------

###?保證測試輸出分辨率統一為?1280x800 ###

### Apalis iMX8/Colibri iMX8X

$ glmark2-es2-wayland --fullscreen

### Verdin iMX8MM/iMX8MP

$ glmark2-es2-wayland --size 1280x800

-------------------------------

c).?測試結果

./ Apalis iMX8QM 2x GC7000XSVX GPU

-------------------------------

root@apalis-imx8:~# glmark2-es2-wayland --fullscreen

EGL: Warning: No default display support on wayland

=======================================================

????glmark2 2017.07

=======================================================

????OpenGL Information

????GL_VENDOR: ????Vivante Corporation

????GL_RENDERER: ??Vivante GC7000XSVX

????GL_VERSION: ???OpenGL ES 3.2 V6.4.3.p1.305572

=======================================================

......

=======================================================

??????????????????????????????????glmark2 Score: 1308

=======================================================

-------------------------------

./ Colibri iMX8X 1x GC7000L GPU

-------------------------------

root@colibri-imx8x-06748681:~# glmark2-es2-wayland --fullscreen

EGL: Warning: No default display support on wayland

=======================================================

????glmark2 2017.07

=======================================================

????OpenGL Information

????GL_VENDOR: ????Vivante Corporation

????GL_RENDERER: ??Vivante GC7000L

????GL_VERSION: ???OpenGL ES 3.1 V6.4.3.p1.305572

=======================================================

......

=======================================================

??????????????????????????????????glmark2 Score: 516

=======================================================

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Mini 1x GC7000NanoUltra GPU

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mm:~# glmark2-es2-wayland --size 1280x800

EGL: Warning: No default display support on wayland

=======================================================

????glmark2 2017.07

=======================================================

????OpenGL Information

????GL_VENDOR: ????Vivante Corporation

????GL_RENDERER: ??Vivante GC7000NanoUltra

????GL_VERSION: ???OpenGL ES 2.0 V6.4.3.p1.305572

=======================================================

......

=======================================================

??????????????????????????????????glmark2 Score: 165

=======================================================

-------------------------------

./ Verdin iMX8M Plus 1x GC7000UL GPU

-------------------------------

root@verdin-imx8mp:~# glmark2-es2-wayland --size 1280x800

EGL: Warning: No default display support on wayland

=======================================================

????glmark2 2017.07

=======================================================

????OpenGL Information

????GL_VENDOR: ????Vivante Corporation

????GL_RENDERER: ??Vivante GC7000UL

????GL_VERSION: ???OpenGL ES 3.1 V6.4.3.p1.305572

=======================================================

......

=======================================================

??????????????????????????????????glmark2 Score: 521

=======================================================

-------------------------------

d).?測試結果圖表展示

9).?總結

本文從CPU、GPU、內存等幾個方面簡單對NXP iMX8系列嵌入式ARM處理器家族產品進行了一些benchmark測試,從結果可以看到iMX8QM各方面性能都是非常領先的;iMX8X強調功耗性能比,非常均衡;iMX8M Mini和iMX8M Plus在CPU方面基本相當,GPU則是iMX8M Plus領先巨大,同時iMX8M Plus還擁有一個神經網絡算法加速的NPU核心,綜合下來iMX8M Plus性能還是好于iMX8M Mini。

參考文獻

https://developer.toradex.cn/knowledge-base/board-support-package/openembedded-core

https://developer.toradex.cn/knowledge-base/toradex-easy-installer-os-and-demo-images

總結

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的NXP iMX8系列处理器核心性能对比测试的全部內容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網站內容還不錯,歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。