私法英語表達爾雅答案

This the name of a new advocacy initiative in Australia by contract programmer Kurt Linghor — focusing on open source adoption in the public sector down under.

這是合同程序員Kurt Linghor在澳大利亞提出的一項新的倡導(dǎo)倡議的名稱-專注于下層公共部門的開源采用。

The fledgling effort, found online at pm-pc.org, seeks to create online report cards on varying levels of government organizations usage of open source solutions. Linghor hopes to achieve this through conducting interviews with IT managers across these institutions.

可在pm-pc.org上在線找到的新興工作旨在創(chuàng)建有關(guān)政府組織使用開源解決方案的不同級別的在線報告卡。 Linghor希望通過與這些機構(gòu)的IT經(jīng)理進行訪談來實現(xiàn)這一目標(biāo)。

Advocacy has done a great deal of good for the open source community over the years, however, as open source matures and becomes viable enterprise material, we also have to tread carefully. Not quaking in our boots at the feet of massive proprietary vendors, but considering the commercial enterprises we seek to invest in our open source endeavors. As much as it may be unpleasant, it remains an issue of perception and presentation in getting past technical managers to executive buy-in for adoption. How we advocate and inquire impacts how those holding corporate checkbooks react to our solicitations.

多年來，倡導(dǎo)為開源社區(qū)帶來了很多好處，但是，隨著開源的成熟和成為可行的企業(yè)材料，我們也必須謹(jǐn)慎行事。 我們不愿為大型專有供應(yīng)商所困擾，而是考慮要尋求對開源事業(yè)進行投資的商業(yè)企業(yè)。 盡管這可能令人不快，但在使過去的技術(shù)經(jīng)理進入高管層接受以供采用之前，這仍然是感知和陳述的問題。 我們?nèi)绾纬珜?dǎo)和詢問會影響那些持有公司支票簿的人對我們的邀請的React。

That said, Linghor comes on a bit strong in his media release announcing the scope of Public Money, Private Code. According to Linghor, the information and systems which run our society should not be at the mercy of peddlers of proprietary software. This may turn off some technical managers who cannot take comments like that to their superiors.

話雖如此，Linghor在其媒體發(fā)布中宣布了《公共資金，私人法典》的范圍時表現(xiàn)得有些強。 Linghor認為，運行我們社會的信息和系統(tǒng)不應(yīng)受專有軟件銷售商的支配。 這可能會關(guān)閉一些技術(shù)經(jīng)理，他們無法向上級發(fā)表這樣的評論。

In fairness, Linghor’s basis for the project is quite sound. He believes the debate is stuck in a total cost of ownership (TCO) debate (true). “It is much more than a monetary issue,” he said. He believes the core issue to continue promoting is the process of peer review of open source software, largely insuring proper revisions for security and vulnerability prevention.

公平地說，Linghor在該項目上的基礎(chǔ)很穩(wěn)固。 他認為，辯論將停留在總擁有成本(TCO)辯論中(true)。 他說：“這不僅僅是金錢問題。” 他認為，繼續(xù)推動的核心問題是對開源軟件進行同行評審的過程，主要是確保對安全性和漏洞預(yù)防進行適當(dāng)?shù)男抻啞?

I am very interested in seeing the reports Linghor develops. This fits in with other organizations studying public sector adoption of open source technology, blogged earlier here.

我對看到Linghor的報告很感興趣。 這與其他研究公共部門采用開源技術(shù)的組織相吻合， 此處早些時候發(fā)表了博客 。

Clearly the adoption rate in government and research will impact commercial adoption as open source solutions are proven enterprise ready. Perhaps Linghor’s effort will catch on and we will see either continental or country-based satellite nodes of Public Money, Private Code, which would begin to establish an ‘open’ research base for all to utilize.

顯然，由于開源解決方案已被證明可用于企業(yè)，因此政府和研究機構(gòu)的采用率將影響商業(yè)采用。 也許Linghor的努力會繼續(xù)發(fā)展，我們將看到大陸或國家的公共資金私人代碼衛(wèi)星節(jié)點，這將開始建立一個“開放的”研究基礎(chǔ)，以供所有人使用。

— As a disclaimer (maybe?) I am a proponent of mixed platform integration. In my more than 12 years at all levels of technology, I have yet to see a single platform architecture work properly other than in small web deployments or in networks of 25 systems or less. It is a fact of life that most of us will interact with heterogeneous environments in the course of administration, design and development.

—作為免責(zé)聲明(也許？)，我是混合平臺集成的支持者。 在我超過12年的各種技術(shù)水平上，除了小型Web部署或25個系統(tǒng)以下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)之外，我還沒有看到一個平臺架構(gòu)能夠正常工作。 生活中的事實是，我們大多數(shù)人在管理，設(shè)計和開發(fā)過程中都會與異構(gòu)環(huán)境進行交互。

翻譯自: https://www.sitepoint.com/public-money-private-code/

私法英語表達爾雅答案

總結(jié)

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的私法英语表达尔雅答案_公款，私法的全部內(nèi)容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。