英國大不列顛百科全書

An interview at the Sydney Morning Herald with Encyclopedia Britannica president Jorge Cauz revealed that the encyclopedia plans to roll out on its web site user contributed content within the next 24 hours. The change in policy is clearly aimed squarely at Wikipedia, which Cauz criticized as being “very uneven” and containing “plenty of cracks.”

《大不列顛百科全書》總裁豪爾赫·考茲在《悉尼先驅晨報》上接受采訪時透露，該百科全書計劃在未來24小時內在其網站上推出用戶貢獻的內容。 政策的改變顯然直接針對了維基百科，卡茲(Cauz)批評維基百科“非常不平衡”并且包含“大量裂縫”。

Cauz said that adding user created content to the encyclopedia would help readers to better learn about the subjects they’re researching by giving them a chance to edit, update, or create their own content. But if there was one theme the permeated the entire interview, it was that Britannica is sick of playing second fiddle to Wikipedia online. Cauz even took a pot shot at Google for allowing Wikipedia entries to rank so highly.

Cauz說，將用戶創建的內容添加到百科全書中將使讀者有機會編輯，更新或創建自己的內容，從而幫助讀者更好地了解他們正在研究的主題。 但是，如果整個采訪中都有一個主題，那就是大不列顛厭倦了在線播放維基百科的第二小提琴。 Cauz甚至因為允許Wikipedia條目排名很高而在Google上大發雷霆。

“If I were to be the CEO of Google or the founders of Google I would be very [displeased] that the best search engine in the world continues to provide as a first link, Wikipedia,” he said. “Is this the best they can do? Is this the best that [their] algorithm can do?”

他說：“如果我要擔任Google的首席執行官或Google的創始人，我會非常不高興，世界上最好的搜索引擎仍會繼續作為第一個鏈接提供，” Wikipedia。 “這是他們能做到的最好的嗎？ 這是他們算法所能做的最好的嗎？”

We found in September that Wikipedia does indeed rank very highly on Google for the most searched for terms, appearing on the first page of results for the majority of them. However, the greater question is whether adding community created content will really help Britannica compete.

我們在9月份發現，對于搜索得最多的術語， 維基百科確實在Google上排名很高，大多數術語都出現在搜索結果的首頁上。 但是，更大的問題是，添加社區創建的內容是否真的會幫助Britannica競爭。

Encyclopedia Britannica won’t just be turning over its content to the masses to edit wiki-style. Rather, community edits will be vetted by the company’s staff of expert writers before being posted to the site. Eventually, changes made via the community content submission process could find their way into the printed version of the encyclopedia, says Cauz, which is reprinted every two years.

不列顛百科全書不僅僅將其內容移交給大眾來編輯Wiki風格。 相反，社區編輯將在發布到站點之前，由公司的專家作家團隊審核。 Cauz說，最終，通過社區內容提交過程進行的更改可能會進入百科全書的印刷版，每兩年重印一次。

However, Britannica is not the first Wikipedia alternative to try competing based on authority. Most notably is Citizendium, a Wikipedia competitor that requires authors to provide their real name (Britannica will, too), and only publishes articles that have been approved by “qualified” experts. I took a look at Citizendium in April 2007, a month after it launched, and found it lacking at the time. Though it was only a month old, the encyclopedia had just 13 approved articles and 1625 being written — leaving it well short of Wikipedia.

但是，大英百科全書不是第一個嘗試基于權威進行競爭的Wikipedia替代方案。 最著名的是Citizendium ，它是Wikipedia的競爭對手，它要求作者提供真實姓名(Britannica也將提供)，并且僅發表經“合格”專家認可的文章。 在Citizendium推出一個月后的2007年4月，我看了一下它，發現當時還缺少它。 盡管只有一個月的歷史，但該百科全書只有13篇已獲批準的文章，并撰寫了1625篇文章，遠遠低于Wikipedia。

Though it was difficult to make judgments about quality, especially with so few articles approved at the time, I found that Citizendium was not markedly better the Wikipedia, and was in some cases noticeably worse. Almost two years later, the site has just 89 approved articles and just over 9100 under development — compare that to Wikipedia, which is growing at a rate of over 1400 articles per day. The real measure of success, however, is traffic, and in that department Citizendium is not performing very well. Compete data shows that while Wikipedia gets almost 60 million visitors per month, Citizendium barely registers.

盡管很難對質量做出判斷，尤其是當時批準的文章很少，但我發現Citizendium并不明顯優于Wikipedia，在某些情況下明顯更差。 差不多兩年后，該站點只有89篇已獲批準的文章，而正在開發的文章超過9100篇，與Wikipedia相比，后者每天以1400篇之多的速度增長。 但是，成功的真正衡量標準是流量，而該部門的公民表現不佳。 競爭數據顯示，雖然Wikipedia每月有將近6000萬訪問者，但Citizendium幾乎沒有注冊。

So can Britannica, taking an almost identical approach to Citizendium, really compete with Wikipedia? Well, there are some key differences that put Britannica in a better position to compete. First, while no where near the popularity of Wikipedia, Britannica is no slouch when it comes to traffic — Compete shows Britannica.com with a monthly audience of nearly 3 million visitors.

那么，大不列顛(Britannica)對公民身份采取幾乎相同的方法，真的可以與維基百科競爭嗎？ 好吧，有一些關鍵差異使大不列顛處于更好的競爭狀態。 首先，雖然Wikipedia的普及率不高，但Britannica的流量卻絲毫不遜色-Compete顯示Britannica.com每月的訪問者接近300萬。

Second, Britannica has a much larger library of content to start with. Unlike Citizendium, which was starting from a basically blank slate. According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Britannica’s database of articles has 46 million words — Wikipedia, meanwhile, had over 600 million words in 2006. But likely, no one visiting Britannica.com is going to complain about a lack of available material.

其次，不列顛尼加最初擁有一個更大的內容庫。 不像公民公民，它是從一個基本空白的板塊開始的。 根據《悉尼先驅晨報》的報道，大不列顛的文章數據庫有4600萬個單詞，而Wikipedia 在2006年有超過6億個單詞。 但是很可能，沒有人訪問Britannica.com會抱怨缺乏可用材料。

So will user contributed content help Britannica to compete with Wikipedia? The bottom line answer is: probably not. Wikipedia will continue to be the web’s top general reference destination because its results are accurate enough for most people’s queries. Simply adding user content won’t make Britannica a more attractive reference destination.

那么，用戶貢獻的內容會幫助Britannica與Wikipedia競爭嗎？ 底線答案是：可能不會。 維基百科將繼續是網絡上最常見的參考站點，因為它的結果對于大多數人的查詢而言足夠準確。 僅添加用戶內容將不會使Britannica成為更具吸引力的參考目的地。

However, increased engagement with users can only be a good thing for the encyclopedia, and will undoubtedly raise traffic. Even though user generated content won’t ultimately help Britannica to take a bite out of Wikipedia’s dominance on the web, it will likely help strengthen their brand by building a community around it.

但是，增加與用戶的互動對于百科全書來說只是一件好事，并且無疑會增加流量。 即使用戶生成的內容最終不會幫助Britannica擺脫Wikipedia在網絡上的統治地位，但它可能會通過圍繞社區建立社區來幫助增強其品牌。

翻譯自: https://www.sitepoint.com/britannica-plans-to-take-on-wikipedia-with-community-edits/

英國大不列顛百科全書

總結

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的英国大不列颠百科全书_大不列颠计划通过社区编辑接受维基百科的全部內容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網站內容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。