日韩性视频-久久久蜜桃-www中文字幕-在线中文字幕av-亚洲欧美一区二区三区四区-撸久久-香蕉视频一区-久久无码精品丰满人妻-国产高潮av-激情福利社-日韩av网址大全-国产精品久久999-日本五十路在线-性欧美在线-久久99精品波多结衣一区-男女午夜免费视频-黑人极品ⅴideos精品欧美棵-人人妻人人澡人人爽精品欧美一区-日韩一区在线看-欧美a级在线免费观看

歡迎訪問 生活随笔!

生活随笔

當前位置: 首頁 > 编程资源 > 编程问答 >内容正文

编程问答

oracle library cache lock,【DB】彻底搞清楚library cache lock的成因和解决方法(一)

發布時間:2024/9/30 编程问答 39 豆豆
生活随笔 收集整理的這篇文章主要介紹了 oracle library cache lock,【DB】彻底搞清楚library cache lock的成因和解决方法(一) 小編覺得挺不錯的,現在分享給大家,幫大家做個參考.

問題描述:

接到應用人員的報告,說是在任何對表CSNOZ629926699966的操作都會hang,包括desc CSNOZ629926699966,例如:

> sqlplus

SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Jan 10 10:11:06 2005

Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.? All rights reserved.

Connected to:

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options

JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

SQL> conn pubuser/pubuser

Connected.

SQL> desc CSNOZ629926699966

。。。

這個進程 hang 了

。。。

詢問了一下之前有無特別的操作,業務人員說很久以前執行了腳本,但是該教本運行很久都沒有結果,然后他就退出了會話,再之后,就出現了上面的情況。腳本內容如下:$ cat CSNOZ629926699966.sh

#!/bin/sh

sqlplus??<< EOF? #use your username/password

create table CSNOZ629926699966 as select * from CSNOZ62992266cs

where mid not in ( select mid from??where servid='020999011964' and status in ('A','B','S'));

exit;

$

$

$

$

解決過程:?> sqlplus "/ as sysdba"

SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Jan 10 10:19:13 2005

Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.? All rights reserved.

Connected to:

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options

JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

SQL> select * from v$lock where block=1;

no rows selected

SQL> /

no rows selected

SQL> /

no rows selected

SQL>

我們看到目前沒有鎖的信息

SQL> select xidusn, object_id, session_id, locked_mode from v$locked_object;

。。。

XIDUSN? OBJECT_ID SESSION_ID LOCKED_MODE

---------- ---------- ---------- -----------

14???????? 18???????? 37?????????? 3

。。。

SQL> /

。。。

XIDUSN? OBJECT_ID SESSION_ID LOCKED_MODE

---------- ---------- ---------- -----------

14???????? 18???????? 37?????????? 3

。。。

SQL> /

。。。

XIDUSN? OBJECT_ID SESSION_ID LOCKED_MODE

---------- ---------- ---------- -----------

14???????? 18???????? 37?????????? 3

。。。

SQL>

查找 v$locked_object,我們發現了一個可疑的會話,SID 37:

SQL> select object_name,owner,object_type from dba_objects where object_id=18;

。。。 。。。

OBJECT_NAME??????????????????? OWNER????????????????????????? OBJECT_TYPE

------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------

OBJ$?????????????????????????? SYS??????????????????????????? TABLE

。。。 。。。

SQL>

奇怪怎么一直有這個鎖??

初步猜測是由于SID為37的會話執行了上面的DDL語句,并在語句未完成前異常退出,

造成了所有訪問那個(DDL語句中涉及到的)對象的進程都hang了。

接下來我們看看等待事件:

SQL> select event,sid,p1,p2,p3 from v$session_wait where event not like 'SQL*%' and event not like 'rdbms%';

EVENT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? P1???????? P2??????? SID

---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

pmon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0????????? 1

ges remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 32????????? 0????????? 4

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 5

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 7

smon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0???????? 19

library cache lock?????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.3835E+19 1.3835E+19???????? 30wakeup time manager?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 0????????? 0???????? 22

7 rows selected.

SQL> /

EVENT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? P1???????? P2??????? SID

---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

pmon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0????????? 1

ges remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 32????????? 0????????? 4

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 5

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 7

smon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0???????? 19

library cache lock?????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.3835E+19 1.3835E+19???????? 30wakeup time manager?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 0????????? 0???????? 22

7 rows selected.

SQL> /

EVENT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? P1???????? P2??????? SID

---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

pmon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0????????? 1

ges remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 32????????? 0????????? 4

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 5

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 7

smon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0???????? 19

library cache lock?????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.3835E+19 1.3835E+19???????? 30wakeup time manager?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 0????????? 0???????? 22

7 rows selected.

SQL> /

EVENT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? P1???????? P2??????? SID

---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

pmon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0????????? 1

ges remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 32????????? 0????????? 4

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 5

gcs remote message?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 64????????? 0????????? 7

smon timer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 300????????? 0???????? 19

library cache lock?????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.3835E+19 1.3835E+19???????? 30wakeup time manager?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 0????????? 0???????? 22

7 rows selected.

SQL>

我們注意到下面的事件:

EVENT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? P1???????? P2??????? SID

---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------

。。。

library cache lock?????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.3835E+19 1.3835E+19???????? 30

。。。

P1 是句柄地址(handle address),也就是'library cache lock'發生的地址。

P2 是一個狀態對象,在這里,它表示在對象上加載的鎖的地址(lock address)。

P1 和 P2都是科學計數發表示的10進制數。

這些信息再次證實了上面的猜測,SID 37阻塞了SID 30。

找出這兩個可疑進程的sid和serial,然后對他們設置10046事件:SQL> select sid,serial# from v$session where sid in (30,37);

SID??? SERIAL#

---------- ----------

30????? 24167

37?????? 2707

SQL> exec dbms_system.set_ev(30,24167,10046,12,'');

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> exec dbms_system.set_ev(37,2707,10046,12,'');

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL>

跟蹤期間咱們再次測試一下,看看有沒有其他線索。

新開一個進程,找出其sid, serial和spid等信息:?> sqlplus pubuser/pubuser

SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Jan 10 11:36:25 2005

Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.? All rights reserved.

Connected to:

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options

JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

SQL> select distinct sid from v$mystat;

SID

----------

33

SQL> select sid,serial# from v$session where sid=33;

SID??? SERIAL#

---------- ----------

33?????? 6639

SQL> SELECT SPID,PID FROM V$PROCESS WHERE ADDR=(SELECT PADDR FROM V$SESSION WHERE SID=37);

SPID??????????????? PID

------------ ----------

20552??????????????? 26

SQL> SELECT SPID,PID FROM V$PROCESS WHERE ADDR=(SELECT PADDR FROM V$SESSION WHERE SID=30);

SPID??????????????? PID

------------ ----------

22580??????????????? 28

SQL> show parameter dump

NAME???????????????????????????????? TYPE??????? VALUE

------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------

background_core_dump???????????????? string????? partial

background_dump_dest???????????????? string????? /ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc

/bdump

core_dump_dest?????????????????????? string????? /ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc

/cdump

max_dump_file_size?????????????????? string????? UNLIMITED

shadow_core_dump???????????????????? string????? partial

user_dump_dest?????????????????????? string????? /ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc

/udump

SQL>

然后,再嘗試對 CSNOZ629926699966 表進行操作

SQL> desc CSNOZ629926699966

。。。

還是hang住了。

于是中斷這個操作(CTRL + C):

SQL> desc CSNOZ629926699966

ERROR:

ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation

SQL> select tname from tab where tname='CSNOZ629926699966';

no rows selected

SQL>查看PUBUSER用戶下的這個表,居然不存在!!

進一步證實了前面的猜測,也就是說會話37阻塞了其他所有操作表CSNOZ629926699966的會話,造成了進程的hang,當然,包括上面的SID 30和SID 33的DDL語句

現在,我們結束10046的事件跟蹤:SQL> exec dbms_system.set_ev(30,24167,0,0,'');

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> exec dbms_system.set_ev(37,2707,0,0,'');

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL>

根據上面記錄的信息,我們知道這兩個會話產生的跟蹤信息分別為:

SID為30的會話,產生的跟蹤文件為:/ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc/udump/csmisc2_ora_22580.trc

SID為37的會話,產生的跟蹤文件為:/ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc/udump/csmisc2_ora_20552.trc

看看trace文件:

> cd /ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc/udump

> ll -tlc

total 4432

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba???????? 332995 Jan 10 12:00 csmisc2_ora_22580.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba?????????? 3168 Jan 10 11:59 csmisc2_ora_20552.trc-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba???????? 407133 Jan? 7 15:10 csmisc2_ora_2708.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????????? 640 Jan? 7 14:48 csmisc2_ora_835.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba?????????? 1590 Dec 30 22:50 csmisc2_ora_16244.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????? 1308403 Dec 30 22:44 csmisc2_ora_16033.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????????? 616 Dec 28 14:16 csmisc2_ora_2176.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????????? 644 Dec? 8 18:22 csmisc2_ora_21083.trc

> mailx -s "csmisc2_ora_22580.trc"??< csmisc2_ora_22580.trc

> mailx -s "csmisc2_ora_20552.trc"??< csmisc2_ora_20552.trc

> exit

SQL>

我們看到SID為30的會話,產生的跟蹤文件(csmisc2_ora_22580.trc)為的主要內容是:/ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc/udump/csmisc2_ora_22580.trc

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options

JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

ORACLE_HOME = /ora9i/app/oracle/product/920

System name: HP-UX

Node name: cs_dc02

Release: B.11.11

Version: U

Machine: 9000/800

Instance name: csmisc2Redo thread mounted by this instance: 2

Oracle process number: 28Unix process pid: 22580, image:??(TNS V1-V3)

*** 2005-01-10 11:31:49.416

***?SESSION ID:(30.24167)?2005-01-10 11:31:49.354

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock'?ela= 507258 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock'?ela= 505686 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507678 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507595 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507880 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507317 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507703 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507683 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 508265 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507100 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507684 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 505889 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507731 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507650 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507604 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

WAIT #0: nam='library cache lock' ela= 507698 p1=-4611686013547141416 p2=-4611686013691716064 p3=1301

。。。 。。。

我們看到SID 30的跟蹤文件中的等待事件就是在V$SESSION_WAIT中看到的'library cache lock' .

再看看SID為37的會話,產生的跟蹤文件(csmisc2_ora_20552.trc)為的主要內容是:

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options

JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

ORACLE_HOME = /ora9i/app/oracle/product/920

System name: HP-UX

Node name: cs_dc02Release: B.11.11

Version: U

Machine: 9000/800

Instance name: csmisc2Redo thread mounted by this instance: 2

Oracle process number: 26

Unix process pid: 20552, image:??(TNS V1-V3)

*** 2005-01-10 11:33:22.702

*** SESSION ID:(37.2707) 2005-01-10 11:33:22.690

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 4 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

*** 2005-01-10 11:35:07.452

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from dblink' ela= 102293555 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 3 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0*** 2005-01-10 11:36:55.980

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from dblink' ela= 105969709 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 4 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

*** 2005-01-10 11:39:05.416

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from dblink' ela= 126390826 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 4 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

*** 2005-01-10 11:41:12.878

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from dblink' ela= 124461520 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 4 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

*** 2005-01-10 11:43:01.285

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from dblink' ela= 105859385 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 4 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

*** 2005-01-10 11:44:48.200

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from dblink' ela= 104397696 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to dblink' ela= 4 p1=675562835 p2=1 p3=0

。。。 。。。

現在我們來dump 系統狀態(systemstate),看看更詳細的信息。

首先簡單的介紹一下 event systemstate。很多人把 systemstate 事件理解為dump發生的那一刻的系統內所有進程的信息,這是個錯誤的概念,事實上,

轉儲 system state 產生的跟蹤文件是從dump那一刻開始到dump任務完成之間一段事件內的系統內所有進程的信息。

dump systemstate產生的跟蹤文件包含了系統中所有進程的進程狀態等信息。每個進程對應跟蹤文件中的一段內容,反映該進程的狀態信息,包括進程信息,會話信息,enqueues信息(主要是lock的信息),緩沖區的信息和該進程在SGA區中持有的(held)對象的狀態等信息。

那么通常在什么情況下使用systemstate比較合適呢??Oracle推薦的使用systemstate事件的幾種情況是:

數據庫 hang 住了

數據庫很慢

進程正在hang

數據庫出現某些錯誤

資源爭用

dump systemstate的語法為:ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS 'immediate trace name systemstate level 10';

也可以使用ORADEBUG實現這個功能

ORADEBUG DUMP SYSTEMSTATE level 10

如果希望在發生某種錯誤時除非systemstate事件,可以在參數文件(spfile或者pfile)中設置event參數,

例如,當系統發生死鎖(出現ORA-00060錯誤)時dump systemstate:

event = "60 trace name systemstate level 10"

言歸正傳,我們dump系統狀態:SQL> ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS 'IMMEDIATE TRACE NAME SYSTEMSTATE LEVEL 8';

Session altered.

SQL> host

>cd /ora9i/app/oracle/admin/csmisc/udump

> ll -ctl

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????? 1070863 Jan 10 13:02 csmisc2_ora_22580.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????? 1345368 Jan 10 13:01 csmisc2_ora_22568.trc-rwxrwxrwx?? 1 ora9i????? dba????????? 44114 Jan 10 12:52 ass1015.awk

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba???????? 407133 Jan? 7 15:10 csmisc2_ora_2708.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????????? 640 Jan? 7 14:48 csmisc2_ora_835.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba?????????? 1590 Dec 30 22:50 csmisc2_ora_16244.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????? 1308403 Dec 30 22:44 csmisc2_ora_16033.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????????? 616 Dec 28 14:16 csmisc2_ora_2176.trc

-rw-r-----?? 1 ora9i????? dba??????????? 644 Dec? 8 18:22 csmisc2_ora_21083.trc

>

> mailx -s "22568"??< csmisc2_ora_22568.trc

這個跟蹤文件很大(因為它包含了所有進程的信息),那么我們從哪里開始看起呢?

首先,通過在跟蹤文件中查找字符串"waiting for 'library cache lock'",我們找到了被阻塞進程的信息:

PROCESS 28:?----------------被阻塞的Oracle進程,這里PROCESS 28對應了V$PROCESS中的PID的值,

也就是說我們可以根據這一信息在V$PROCESS和V$SESSION找到被阻塞的會話的信息? ----------------------------------------

SO: c000000109c83bf0, type: 2, owner: 0000000000000000, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00

(process) Oracle pid=28,?calls cur/top: c00000010b277890/c00000010b277890, flag: (0) -

int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0

(post info) last post received: 17 24 6

last post received-location: ksusig

last process to post me: c000000109c840f8 25 0

last post sent: 0 0 15

last post sent-location: ksasnd

last process posted by me: c000000109c7ff90 1 6

(latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0

Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: c000000109eefda0

O/S info: user: ora9i, term: pts/th, ospid: 22580? ----------------該進程的操作系統進程號,對應于V$PROCESS中的SPID

OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 22580, image:??(TNS V1-V3)

----------------------------------------

SO: c000000109f02c68, type: 4, owner: c000000109c83bf0, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00

(session) trans: 0000000000000000, creator: c000000109c83bf0, flag: (100041) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-

DID: 0002-001C-00000192, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000

txn branch: 0000000000000000

oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: c00000011f8ea068, psql: c00000011f8ea068, user: 50/PUBUSER

O/S info: user: ora9i, term: , ospid: 22536, machine: cs_dc02

program:(TNS V1-V3)

application name: SQL*Plus, hashvalue=3669949024waiting for 'library cache lock' blockingsess=0x0?seq=18589 wait_time=0

handle address=c000000122e2a6d8, lock address=c00000011a449e20, 100*mode+namespace=515

。。。 。。。

SO: c00000010b277890, type: 3, owner: c000000109c83bf0, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00

(call) sess: cur c000000109f02c68, rec 0, usr c000000109f02c68; depth: 0

----------------------------------------

SO: c00000011a449e20, type: 51, owner: c00000010b277890, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00

LIBRARY OBJECT LOCK: lock=c00000011a449e20?handle=c000000122e2a6d8?request=S

call pin=0000000000000000 session pin=0000000000000000

htl=c00000011a449e90[c00000011a4bc350,c00000011a4bc350] htb=c00000011a4bc350

user=c000000109f02c68 session=c000000109f02c68?count=0 flags=[00] savepoint=463

the rest of the object was already dumped

。。。 。。。

請注意下面的信息:????waiting for 'library cache lock' blocking sess=0x0?seq=18589 wait_time=0

handle address=c000000122e2a6d8, lock address=c00000011a449e20, 100*mode+namespace=515

這段信息告訴我們ORACLE PID為 28的進程(PROCESS 28),正在等待'library cache lock' ,通過‘handle address=c000000122e2a6d8’我們可以找到阻塞它的會話的ORACLE PID信息。

還要注意這段信息:????? LIBRARY OBJECT LOCK: lock=c00000011a449e20?handle=c000000122e2a6d8?request=S

call pin=0000000000000000 session pin=0000000000000000

htl=c00000011a449e90[c00000011a4bc350,c00000011a4bc350] htb=c00000011a4bc350

user=c000000109f02c68 session=c000000109f02c68?count=0 flags=[00] savepoint=463

這里就是阻塞PROCESS 28進程的會話的信息。

簡單的記住這個依據的要點是:

waiting session的'handle address'的值對應于blocking session的'handle'的值。

回過頭來,看看這個值,它應于上面我們在V$SESSION_WAIT中看到的P1和P2的值:

SQL> select to_number('C000000122E2A6D8','XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX') from dual;

TO_NUMBER('C000000122E2A6D8','XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX')

----------------------------------------------------------------

1.3835E+19

SQL>

問題的成因已經基本上明確了,這里推薦兩種解決問題的方法:

方法1,根據 c000000122e2a6d8 地址,我們可以得到當前在library cache中相應的鎖信息:SQL> l

1? select INST_ID,USER_NAME,KGLNAOBJ,KGLLKSNM,KGLLKUSE,KGLLKSES,KGLLKMOD,KGLLKREQ,KGLLKPNS,KGLLKHDL

2* from X$KGLLK where KGLLKHDL = 'C000000122E2A6D8' order by KGLLKSNM,KGLNAOBJ

SQL> /

INST_ID USER_NAME???? KGLNAOBJ?????????????????KGLLKSNMKGLLKUSE?????????KGLLKSES?????KGLLKMOD??KGLLKREQ?KGLLKPNS???????? KGLLKHDL

---------- ------------- ---------------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------

2 PUBUSER?????? CSNOZ629926699966??????????????30 C000000109F02C68 C000000109F02C680????????? 200?????????????? C000000122E2A6D8

2 PUBUSER?????? CSNOZ629926699966??????????????37 C000000108C99E28 C000000108C99E283????????? 000?????????????? C000000122E2A6D8

SQL>

按照Oracle推薦的做法,我們現在應該使用'alter system kill session'命令kill掉SID 37,結果得到了ORA-00031錯誤:

SQL> alter system kill session '37,2707';

alter system kill session '37,2707'

*

ERROR at line 1:

ORA-00031: session marked for kill

SQL>

檢查SID 37的狀態:

SQL> set linesize 150

SQL> col program for a50

SQL> select sid,serial#,status,username,program from v$session where sid=37;

SID??? SERIAL# STATUS?? USERNAME?????????????????????? PROGRAM

---------- ---------- -------- ------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------

37?????? 2707?KILLED?? PUBUSER?????????????????????????(TNS V1-V3)

SQL>

再次證實了我們最初的想法—— 有人在執行了某個需要運行很久的DDL(多數是語句效率低,當然不排除遭遇bug的可能),

然后沒等語句結束就異常退出了會話。

這個例子中我們在上面的跟蹤文件已經找到了該會話對應的操作系統進程(SPID),如果在其他情況下,我們如何找到這種狀態為'KILLED'

的操作系統進程號(SPID)呢?

下面給出了一個方法,可以借鑒:

SQL> l

1? SELECT s.username,s.status,

2? x.ADDR,x.KSLLAPSC,x.KSLLAPSN,x.KSLLASPO,x.KSLLID1R,x.KSLLRTYP,

3? decode(bitand (x.ksuprflg,2),0,null,1)

4? FROM x$ksupr x,v$session s

5? WHERE s.paddr(+)=x.addr

6? and bitand(ksspaflg,1)!=0

7* and s.sid=37

SQL> /

USERNAME?????????????????????? STATUS?? ADDR?????????????? KSLLAPSC?? KSLLAPSN KSLLASPO?????? KSLLID1R KS D

------------------------------ -------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- -- -

PUBUSER????????????????????????KILLED?? C000000109C831E0???????? 41???????? 15 16243??????????????? 17

SQL>

x$ksupr.ADDR列的值對應了V$PROCESS 中的ADDR的值,知道了這個SPID的地址,找到這個操作系統進程(SPID)就簡單了,例如:

SQL>?select spid,pid from v$process where addr='C000000109C831E0';

SPID??????????????? PID

------------ ----------

20552??????????????? 26

SQL>

現在,我們只需要在操作系統上 kill 操作系統進程20552就可以了:

> ps -ef | grep 20552

ora9i 20552???? 1? 0? Jan? 8? ????????? 0:01 oraclecsmisc2 (LOCAL=NO)

ora9i 14742 14740? 0 17:19:02 pts/ti??? 0:00 grep 20552

> kill -9 20552

> ps -ef | grep 20552

ora9i 14966 14964? 0 17:40:01 pts/ti??? 0:00 grep 20552

>

再來檢查一下SID 37的信息,我們看到這個會話是真的被kill掉了,

> exit

SQL> select sid,serial#,status,username,program from v$session where sid=37;

no rows selected

SQL> l

1? SELECT s.username,s.status,

2? x.ADDR,x.KSLLAPSC,x.KSLLAPSN,x.KSLLASPO,x.KSLLID1R,x.KSLLRTYP,

3? decode(bitand (x.ksuprflg,2),0,null,1)

4? FROM x$ksupr x,v$session s

5? WHERE s.paddr(+)=x.addr

6? and bitand(ksspaflg,1)!=0

7* and s.sid=37

SQL> /

no rows selected

SQL>

回到剛才hang住的會話,它已經恢復了正常操作,

并且我們已經得到了'ORA-04043: object CSNOZ629926699966 does not exist'這個正常的信息:

SQL> desc CSNOZ629926699966

ERROR:

ORA-04043: object CSNOZ629926699966 does not exist

SQL>

在開一個會話,測試一把:

> sqlplus pubuser/pubuser

SQL*Plus: Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Jan 10 17:42:16 2005

Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.? All rights reserved.

Connected to:

Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning and Real Application Clusters options

JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

SQL> set timing on

SQL> desc CSNOZ629926699966

ERROR:

ORA-04043: object CSNOZ629926699966 does not exist

SQL>

當發出命令'desc CSNOZ629926699966'的時候,我們看到系統立刻返回了ORA-04043: object CSNOZ629926699966 does not exist'信息,問題就此解決了。

這里,簡單的介紹一下X$KGLLK,這個基表保存了庫緩存中對象的鎖的信息,它對于解決這類問題特別有用,其名稱的含義如下:

[K]ernel Layer

[G]eneric Layer

[L]ibrary Cache Manager? ( defined and mapped from kqlf )

Object Locks

X$KGLLK - Object [L]oc[K]s

KGLNAOBJ 列包含了在librarky cache中的對象上執行命令的語句的前80個字符(其實從這里我們也可以大大縮小范圍了)

X$KGLLK.KGLLKUSE 和 x$kgllk.KGLLKSES 對應于跟蹤文件中的owner的值

X$KGLLK.KGLLKADR

X$KGLLK.KGLLKHDL 對應于跟蹤文件中的handle的值(handle=C000000122E2A6D8),也就是'library cache lock'的地址

X$KGLLK.KGLLKPNS 對應于跟蹤文件中的session pin的值

X$KGLLK.KGLLKSPN對應于跟蹤文件中的savepoint的值

我們再來看一下更全面的信息:

SQL> set linesize 2000

SQL> select * from X$KGLLK where KGLLKHDL = 'C000000122E2A6D8' order by KGLLKSNM,KGLNAOBJ

2? /

ADDR?????????????????? INDX??? INST_ID KGLLKADR???????? KGLLKUSE???????? KGLLKSES?????????? KGLLKSNM KGLLKHDL???????? KGLLKPNC???????? KGLLKPNS?????? KGLLKCNT?? KGLLKMOD?? KGLLKREQ?? KGLLKFLG?? KGLLKSPN KGLLKHTB?????????? KGLNAHSH KGLHDPAR?????????? KGLHDNSP USER_NAME????????????????? KGLNAOBJ

---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------

800003FB0007E4D0???????? 33????????? 2 C00000011A449E20 C000000109F02C68 C000000109F02C68???????? 30 C000000122E2A6D8 00?????????????? 00??????????????????? 0????????? 0????????? 2????????? 0??????? 463 C00000011A4BC350 3990848181 C000000122E2A6D8????????? 1 PUBUSER??????????????????????????? CSNOZ629926699966

800003FB0007E5B0???????? 34????????? 2 C00000011A44A150 C000000108C99E28 C000000108C99E28???????? 37 C000000122E2A6D8 00?????????????? 00??????????????????? 1????????? 3????????? 0????????? 0??????? 179 C00000011A4BB328 3990848181 C000000122E2A6D8????????? 1 PUBUSER??????????????????????????? CSNOZ629926699966

SQL> set linesize 100

SQL> l

1* select * from X$KGLLK where KGLLKHDL = 'C000000122E2A6D8' order by KGLLKSNM,KGLNAOBJ

SQL> /

ADDR?????????????????? INDX??? INST_ID KGLLKADR???????? KGLLKUSE???????? KGLLKSES?????????? KGLLKSNM

---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------

KGLLKHDL???????? KGLLKPNC???????? KGLLKPNS?????????? KGLLKCNT?? KGLLKMOD?? KGLLKREQ?? KGLLKFLG

---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

KGLLKSPN KGLLKHTB?????????? KGLNAHSH KGLHDPAR?????????? KGLHDNSP USER_NAME

---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- ---------- ------------------------------

KGLNAOBJ

------------------------------------------------------------

800003FB0007E4D0???????? 33????????? 2 C00000011A449E20 C000000109F02C68 C000000109F02C68???????? 30

C000000122E2A6D8 00?????????????? 00??????????????????????? 0????????? 0????????? 2????????? 0

463 C00000011A4BC350 3990848181 C000000122E2A6D8????????? 1 PUBUSER

CSNOZ629926699966

800003FB0007E5B0???????? 34????????? 2 C00000011A44A150 C000000108C99E28 C000000108C99E28???????? 37

C000000122E2A6D8 00?????????????? 00??????????????????????? 1????????? 3????????? 0????????? 0

179 C00000011A4BB328 3990848181 C000000122E2A6D8????????? 1 PUBUSER

CSNOZ629926699966

SQL>

總結

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的oracle library cache lock,【DB】彻底搞清楚library cache lock的成因和解决方法(一)的全部內容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網站內容還不錯,歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。