我認為isEmpty()更有效率。然而，智能編譯器可能會優化equals(“”)調用。從

OpenJDK source：

671 public boolean isEmpty() {

672 return count == 0;

673 }

1013 public boolean equals(Object anObject) {

1014 if (this == anObject) {

1015 return true;

1016 }

1017 if (anObject instanceof String) {

1018 String anotherString = (String)anObject;

1019 int n = count;

1020 if (n == anotherString.count) {

1021 char v1[] = value;

1022 char v2[] = anotherString.value;

1023 int i = offset;

1024 int j = anotherString.offset;

1025 while (n-- != 0) {

1026 if (v1[i++] != v2[j++])

1027 return false;

1028 }

1029 return true;

1030 }

1031 }

1032 return false;

1033 }

還有answer here關于是否使用str.isEmpty()或“”.equals(str)是現成的：

The main benefit of "".equals(s) is you don’t need the null check (equals will check its argument and return false if it’s null), which you seem to not care about. If you’re not worried about s being null (or are otherwise checking for it), I would definitely use s.isEmpty(); it shows exactly what you’re checking, you care whether or not s is empty, not whether it equals the empty string

總結

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的java string isempty,java – String.isEmpty()和String.equals(“”)之间的区别的全部內容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網站內容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。