吳恩達(dá)deeplearning.ai課程作業(yè)，自己寫的答案。
補充說明：
1. 評論中總有人問為什么直接復(fù)制這些notebook運行不了？請不要直接復(fù)制粘貼，不可能運行通過的，這個只是notebook中我們要自己寫的那部分，要正確運行還需要其他py文件，請自己到GitHub上下載完整的。這里的部分僅僅是參考用的，建議還是自己按照提示一點一點寫，如果實在卡住了再看答案。個人覺得這樣才是正確的學(xué)習(xí)方法，況且作業(yè)也不算難。
2. 關(guān)于評論中有人說我是抄襲，注釋還沒別人詳細(xì)，復(fù)制下來還運行不過。答復(fù)是：做伸手黨之前，請先搞清這個作業(yè)是干什么的。大家都是從GitHub上下載原始的作業(yè)，然后根據(jù)代碼前面的提示（通常會指定函數(shù)和公式）來編寫代碼，而且后面還有expected output供你比對，如果程序正確，結(jié)果一般來說是一樣的。請不要無腦噴，說什么跟別人的答案一樣的。說到底，我們要做的就是，看他的文字部分，根據(jù)提示在代碼中加入部分自己的代碼。我們自己要寫的部分只有那么一小部分代碼。
3. 由于實在很反感無腦噴子，故禁止了下面的評論功能，請見諒。如果有問題，請私信我，在力所能及的范圍內(nèi)會盡量幫忙。

Initialization

Welcome to the first assignment of “Improving Deep Neural Networks”.

Training your neural network requires specifying an initial value of the weights. A well chosen initialization method will help learning.

If you completed the previous course of this specialization, you probably followed our instructions for weight initialization, and it has worked out so far. But how do you choose the initialization for a new neural network? In this notebook, you will see how different initializations lead to different results.

A well chosen initialization can:
- Speed up the convergence of gradient descent
- Increase the odds of gradient descent converging to a lower training (and generalization) error

To get started, run the following cell to load the packages and the planar dataset you will try to classify.

import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import sklearn import sklearn.datasets from init_utils import sigmoid, relu, compute_loss, forward_propagation, backward_propagation from init_utils import update_parameters, predict, load_dataset, plot_decision_boundary, predict_dec%matplotlib inline plt.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = (7.0, 4.0) # set default size of plots plt.rcParams['image.interpolation'] = 'nearest' plt.rcParams['image.cmap'] = 'gray'# load image dataset: blue/red dots in circles train_X, train_Y, test_X, test_Y = load_dataset()

You would like a classifier to separate the blue dots from the red dots.

1 - Neural Network model

You will use a 3-layer neural network (already implemented for you). Here are the initialization methods you will experiment with:
- Zeros initialization – setting initialization = "zeros" in the input argument.
- Random initialization – setting initialization = "random" in the input argument. This initializes the weights to large random values.
- He initialization – setting initialization = "he" in the input argument. This initializes the weights to random values scaled according to a paper by He et al., 2015.

Instructions: Please quickly read over the code below, and run it. In the next part you will implement the three initialization methods that this model() calls.

def model(X, Y, learning_rate = 0.01, num_iterations = 15000, print_cost = True, initialization = "he"):"""Implements a three-layer neural network: LINEAR->RELU->LINEAR->RELU->LINEAR->SIGMOID.Arguments:X -- input data, of shape (2, number of examples)Y -- true "label" vector (containing 0 for red dots; 1 for blue dots), of shape (1, number of examples)learning_rate -- learning rate for gradient descent num_iterations -- number of iterations to run gradient descentprint_cost -- if True, print the cost every 1000 iterationsinitialization -- flag to choose which initialization to use ("zeros","random" or "he")Returns:parameters -- parameters learnt by the model"""grads = {}costs = [] # to keep track of the lossm = X.shape[1] # number of exampleslayers_dims = [X.shape[0], 10, 5, 1]# Initialize parameters dictionary.if initialization == "zeros":parameters = initialize_parameters_zeros(layers_dims)elif initialization == "random":parameters = initialize_parameters_random(layers_dims)elif initialization == "he":parameters = initialize_parameters_he(layers_dims)# Loop (gradient descent)for i in range(0, num_iterations):# Forward propagation: LINEAR -> RELU -> LINEAR -> RELU -> LINEAR -> SIGMOID.a3, cache = forward_propagation(X, parameters)# Losscost = compute_loss(a3, Y)# Backward propagation.grads = backward_propagation(X, Y, cache)# Update parameters.parameters = update_parameters(parameters, grads, learning_rate)# Print the loss every 1000 iterationsif print_cost and i % 1000 == 0:print("Cost after iteration {}: {}".format(i, cost))costs.append(cost)# plot the lossplt.plot(costs)plt.ylabel('cost')plt.xlabel('iterations (per hundreds)')plt.title("Learning rate =" + str(learning_rate))plt.show()return parameters

2 - Zero initialization

There are two types of parameters to initialize in a neural network:
- the weight matrices (W[1],W[2],W[3],...,W[L?1],W[L])(W[1],W[2],W[3],...,W[L?1],W[L])
- the bias vectors (b[1],b[2],b[3],...,b[L?1],b[L])(b[1],b[2],b[3],...,b[L?1],b[L])

Exercise: Implement the following function to initialize all parameters to zeros. You’ll see later that this does not work well since it fails to “break symmetry”, but lets try it anyway and see what happens. Use np.zeros((..,..)) with the correct shapes.

# GRADED FUNCTION: initialize_parameters_zeros def initialize_parameters_zeros(layers_dims):"""Arguments:layer_dims -- python array (list) containing the size of each layer.Returns:parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters "W1", "b1", ..., "WL", "bL":W1 -- weight matrix of shape (layers_dims[1], layers_dims[0])b1 -- bias vector of shape (layers_dims[1], 1)...WL -- weight matrix of shape (layers_dims[L], layers_dims[L-1])bL -- bias vector of shape (layers_dims[L], 1)"""parameters = {}L = len(layers_dims) # number of layers in the networkfor l in range(1, L):### START CODE HERE ### (≈ 2 lines of code)parameters['W' + str(l)] = np.zeros((layers_dims[l], layers_dims[l-1]))parameters['b' + str(l)] = np.zeros((layers_dims[l], 1))### END CODE HERE ###return parameters parameters = initialize_parameters_zeros([3,2,1]) print("W1 = " + str(parameters["W1"])) print("b1 = " + str(parameters["b1"])) print("W2 = " + str(parameters["W2"])) print("b2 = " + str(parameters["b2"])) W1 = [[ 0. 0. 0.][ 0. 0. 0.]] b1 = [[ 0.][ 0.]] W2 = [[ 0. 0.]] b2 = [[ 0.]]

Expected Output:

W1	[[ 0. 0. 0.] [ 0. 0. 0.]]
b1	[[ 0.] [ 0.]]
W2	[[ 0. 0.]]
b2	[[ 0.]]

Run the following code to train your model on 15,000 iterations using zeros initialization.

parameters = model(train_X, train_Y, initialization = "zeros") print ("On the train set:") predictions_train = predict(train_X, train_Y, parameters) print ("On the test set:") predictions_test = predict(test_X, test_Y, parameters) Cost after iteration 0: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 1000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 2000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 3000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 4000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 5000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 6000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 7000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 8000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 9000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 10000: 0.6931471805599455 Cost after iteration 11000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 12000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 13000: 0.6931471805599453 Cost after iteration 14000: 0.6931471805599453

On the train set: Accuracy: 0.5 On the test set: Accuracy: 0.5

The performance is really bad, and the cost does not really decrease, and the algorithm performs no better than random guessing. Why? Lets look at the details of the predictions and the decision boundary:

print ("predictions_train = " + str(predictions_train)) print ("predictions_test = " + str(predictions_test)) predictions_train = [[0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0]] predictions_test = [[0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]] plt.title("Model with Zeros initialization") axes = plt.gca() axes.set_xlim([-1.5,1.5]) axes.set_ylim([-1.5,1.5]) plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict_dec(parameters, x.T), train_X, train_Y)

The model is predicting 0 for every example.

In general, initializing all the weights to zero results in the network failing to break symmetry. This means that every neuron in each layer will learn the same thing, and you might as well be training a neural network with n[l]=1n[l]=1 for every layer, and the network is no more powerful than a linear classifier such as logistic regression.

What you should remember:
- The weights W[l]W[l] should be initialized randomly to break symmetry.
- It is however okay to initialize the biases b[l]b[l] to zeros. Symmetry is still broken so long as W[l]W[l] is initialized randomly.

3 - Random initialization

To break symmetry, lets intialize the weights randomly. Following random initialization, each neuron can then proceed to learn a different function of its inputs. In this exercise, you will see what happens if the weights are intialized randomly, but to very large values.

Exercise: Implement the following function to initialize your weights to large random values (scaled by *10) and your biases to zeros. Use np.random.randn(..,..) * 10 for weights and np.zeros((.., ..)) for biases. We are using a fixed np.random.seed(..) to make sure your “random” weights match ours, so don’t worry if running several times your code gives you always the same initial values for the parameters.

# GRADED FUNCTION: initialize_parameters_randomdef initialize_parameters_random(layers_dims):"""Arguments:layer_dims -- python array (list) containing the size of each layer.Returns:parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters "W1", "b1", ..., "WL", "bL":W1 -- weight matrix of shape (layers_dims[1], layers_dims[0])b1 -- bias vector of shape (layers_dims[1], 1)...WL -- weight matrix of shape (layers_dims[L], layers_dims[L-1])bL -- bias vector of shape (layers_dims[L], 1)"""np.random.seed(3) # This seed makes sure your "random" numbers will be the as oursparameters = {}L = len(layers_dims) # integer representing the number of layersfor l in range(1, L):### START CODE HERE ### (≈ 2 lines of code)parameters['W' + str(l)] = np.random.randn(layers_dims[l], layers_dims[l-1]) * 10parameters['b' + str(l)] = np.zeros((layers_dims[l], 1))### END CODE HERE ###return parameters parameters = initialize_parameters_random([3, 2, 1]) print("W1 = " + str(parameters["W1"])) print("b1 = " + str(parameters["b1"])) print("W2 = " + str(parameters["W2"])) print("b2 = " + str(parameters["b2"])) W1 = [[ 17.88628473 4.36509851 0.96497468][-18.63492703 -2.77388203 -3.54758979]] b1 = [[ 0.][ 0.]] W2 = [[-0.82741481 -6.27000677]] b2 = [[ 0.]]

Expected Output:

W1	[[ 17.88628473 4.36509851 0.96497468] [-18.63492703 -2.77388203 -3.54758979]]
b1	[[ 0.] [ 0.]]
W2	[[-0.82741481 -6.27000677]]
b2	[[ 0.]]

Run the following code to train your model on 15,000 iterations using random initialization.

parameters = model(train_X, train_Y, initialization = "random") print ("On the train set:") predictions_train = predict(train_X, train_Y, parameters) print ("On the test set:") predictions_test = predict(test_X, test_Y, parameters) /root/deeplearning.ai/homework/Course2 Improving Deep Neural Network/Class2 Week1/assignment1/init_utils.py:145: RuntimeWarning: divide by zero encountered in loglogprobs = np.multiply(-np.log(a3),Y) + np.multiply(-np.log(1 - a3), 1 - Y) /root/deeplearning.ai/homework/Course2 Improving Deep Neural Network/Class2 Week1/assignment1/init_utils.py:145: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in multiplylogprobs = np.multiply(-np.log(a3),Y) + np.multiply(-np.log(1 - a3), 1 - Y)Cost after iteration 0: inf Cost after iteration 1000: 0.6247924745506072 Cost after iteration 2000: 0.5980258056061102 Cost after iteration 3000: 0.5637539062842213 Cost after iteration 4000: 0.5501256393526495 Cost after iteration 5000: 0.5443826306793814 Cost after iteration 6000: 0.5373895855049121 Cost after iteration 7000: 0.47157999220550006 Cost after iteration 8000: 0.39770475516243037 Cost after iteration 9000: 0.3934560146692851 Cost after iteration 10000: 0.3920227137490125 Cost after iteration 11000: 0.38913700035966736 Cost after iteration 12000: 0.3861358766546214 Cost after iteration 13000: 0.38497629552893475 Cost after iteration 14000: 0.38276694641706693

On the train set: Accuracy: 0.83 On the test set: Accuracy: 0.86

If you see “inf” as the cost after the iteration 0, this is because of numerical roundoff; a more numerically sophisticated implementation would fix this. But this isn’t worth worrying about for our purposes.

Anyway, it looks like you have broken symmetry, and this gives better results. than before. The model is no longer outputting all 0s.

print (predictions_train) print (predictions_test) [[1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 00 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 01 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 10 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 10 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 11 1 1 0]] [[1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 01 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 11 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0]] plt.title("Model with large random initialization") axes = plt.gca() axes.set_xlim([-1.5,1.5]) axes.set_ylim([-1.5,1.5]) plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict_dec(parameters, x.T), train_X, train_Y)

Observations:
- The cost starts very high. This is because with large random-valued weights, the last activation (sigmoid) outputs results that are very close to 0 or 1 for some examples, and when it gets that example wrong it incurs a very high loss for that example. Indeed, when log(a[3])=log(0)log?(a[3])=log?(0), the loss goes to infinity.
- Poor initialization can lead to vanishing/exploding gradients, which also slows down the optimization algorithm.
- If you train this network longer you will see better results, but initializing with overly large random numbers slows down the optimization.

In summary:
- Initializing weights to very large random values does not work well.
- Hopefully intializing with small random values does better. The important question is: how small should be these random values be? Lets find out in the next part!

4 - He initialization

Finally, try “He Initialization”; this is named for the first author of He et al., 2015. (If you have heard of “Xavier initialization”, this is similar except Xavier initialization uses a scaling factor for the weights W[l]W[l] of sqrt(1./layers_dims[l-1]) where He initialization would use sqrt(2./layers_dims[l-1]).)

Exercise: Implement the following function to initialize your parameters with He initialization.

Hint: This function is similar to the previous initialize_parameters_random(...). The only difference is that instead of multiplying np.random.randn(..,..) by 10, you will multiply it by 2dimension of the previous layer??????????????????√2dimension of the previous layer, which is what He initialization recommends for layers with a ReLU activation.

# GRADED FUNCTION: initialize_parameters_hedef initialize_parameters_he(layers_dims):"""Arguments:layer_dims -- python array (list) containing the size of each layer.Returns:parameters -- python dictionary containing your parameters "W1", "b1", ..., "WL", "bL":W1 -- weight matrix of shape (layers_dims[1], layers_dims[0])b1 -- bias vector of shape (layers_dims[1], 1)...WL -- weight matrix of shape (layers_dims[L], layers_dims[L-1])bL -- bias vector of shape (layers_dims[L], 1)"""np.random.seed(3)parameters = {}L = len(layers_dims) - 1 # integer representing the number of layersfor l in range(1, L + 1):### START CODE HERE ### (≈ 2 lines of code)parameters['W' + str(l)] = np.random.randn(layers_dims[l], layers_dims[l-1]) * np.sqrt(2 / layers_dims[l-1])parameters['b' + str(l)] = np.zeros((layers_dims[l], 1))### END CODE HERE ###return parameters parameters = initialize_parameters_he([2, 4, 1]) print("W1 = " + str(parameters["W1"])) print("b1 = " + str(parameters["b1"])) print("W2 = " + str(parameters["W2"])) print("b2 = " + str(parameters["b2"])) W1 = [[ 1.78862847 0.43650985][ 0.09649747 -1.8634927 ][-0.2773882 -0.35475898][-0.08274148 -0.62700068]] b1 = [[ 0.][ 0.][ 0.][ 0.]] W2 = [[-0.03098412 -0.33744411 -0.92904268 0.62552248]] b2 = [[ 0.]]

Expected Output:

W1	[[ 1.78862847 0.43650985] [ 0.09649747 -1.8634927 ] [-0.2773882 -0.35475898] [-0.08274148 -0.62700068]]
b1	[[ 0.] [ 0.] [ 0.] [ 0.]]
W2	[[-0.03098412 -0.33744411 -0.92904268 0.62552248]]
b2	[[ 0.]]

Run the following code to train your model on 15,000 iterations using He initialization.

parameters = model(train_X, train_Y, initialization = "he") print ("On the train set:") predictions_train = predict(train_X, train_Y, parameters) print ("On the test set:") predictions_test = predict(test_X, test_Y, parameters) Cost after iteration 0: 0.8830537463419761 Cost after iteration 1000: 0.6879825919728063 Cost after iteration 2000: 0.6751286264523371 Cost after iteration 3000: 0.6526117768893805 Cost after iteration 4000: 0.6082958970572938 Cost after iteration 5000: 0.5304944491717495 Cost after iteration 6000: 0.4138645817071794 Cost after iteration 7000: 0.3117803464844441 Cost after iteration 8000: 0.23696215330322562 Cost after iteration 9000: 0.1859728720920684 Cost after iteration 10000: 0.15015556280371808 Cost after iteration 11000: 0.12325079292273551 Cost after iteration 12000: 0.09917746546525937 Cost after iteration 13000: 0.08457055954024283 Cost after iteration 14000: 0.07357895962677366

On the train set: Accuracy: 0.993333333333 On the test set: Accuracy: 0.96 plt.title("Model with He initialization") axes = plt.gca() axes.set_xlim([-1.5,1.5]) axes.set_ylim([-1.5,1.5]) plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict_dec(parameters, x.T), train_X, train_Y)

Observations:
- The model with He initialization separates the blue and the red dots very well in a small number of iterations.

5 - Conclusions

You have seen three different types of initializations. For the same number of iterations and same hyperparameters the comparison is:

Model	Train accuracy	Problem/Comment
3-layer NN with zeros initialization	50%	fails to break symmetry
3-layer NN with large random initialization	83%	too large weights
3-layer NN with He initialization	99%	recommended method

What you should remember from this notebook:
- Different initializations lead to different results
- Random initialization is used to break symmetry and make sure different hidden units can learn different things
- Don’t intialize to values that are too large
- He initialization works well for networks with ReLU activations.

總結(jié)

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的吴恩达深度学习课程deeplearning.ai课程作业：Class 2 Week 1 1.Initialization的全部內(nèi)容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。