BIO結(jié)構(gòu)中有一個(gè)很重要的字段叫做bi_sector,在高版本中這個(gè)字段已經(jīng)叫bi_iter.bi_sector了，這個(gè)不是重點(diǎn)，重點(diǎn)是下面要說的。

當(dāng)讀寫一個(gè)block device的時(shí)候，會(huì)提交一個(gè)bio數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)給make_request_fn，那么這個(gè)bio結(jié)構(gòu)中的bi_sector到底表示什么意思呢？

在bio.h中有這么一行注釋

sector_t?? ??? ?bi_sector;?? ?/* device address in 512 byte? sectors */

大意是說bi_sector是設(shè)備的地址，什么地址？以sector（512字節(jié)）為單位，也就是說以這個(gè)sector為起始地址，去block設(shè)備請求數(shù)據(jù)。

一般硬盤都是以扇區(qū)（sector）為單位的，而且一般也只有硬盤有扇區(qū)，Linux中的分區(qū)比如/dev/sda1是建立在硬盤/dev/sda的基礎(chǔ)上的，對于每一個(gè)分區(qū)來講，我們通過fdisk來查看分區(qū)的細(xì)節(jié)信息，如下：

Device ? ? Boot ? Start ? ? ?End ?Sectors ?Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 ?* ? ? ? 2048 ? 999423 ? 997376 ?487M 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 ? ? ? 1001470 41940991 40939522 19.5G ?5 Extended

硬盤sda有兩個(gè)分區(qū)，分別是/dev/sda1和/dev/sda2，值得注意的是，分區(qū)/dev/sda1的起始扇區(qū)是2048，/dev/sda2的起始分區(qū)是1001470，這個(gè)起始扇區(qū)在本文中非常重要。

對于硬盤來講，在make_request_fn中，bio的bi_sector代表什么呢？

代表的就是硬盤的扇區(qū)，比如bi_sector為0，則表示從0扇區(qū)開始讀取或者寫入數(shù)據(jù)。

對于分區(qū)來講，在make_request_fn中，bio的bi_sector又代表什么呢？

同樣，比如bio的bi_sector為0，還是表示從0扇區(qū)開始讀取或者寫入數(shù)據(jù)。只是，make_request_fn中很難收到這樣的請求了，除非這個(gè)分區(qū)的起始扇區(qū)為0。為什么呢？這就是起始扇區(qū)的原因，對于分區(qū)來講，收到的bio請求中，這個(gè)bi_sector總是大于等于起始扇區(qū)的，比如對于/dev/sda2來講，收到的請求中的bi_sector總是大于等于1001470的。

總結(jié)一下，無論是硬盤還是分區(qū)，在make_request_fn中，收到的bio請求中的bi_sector已經(jīng)是真實(shí)對應(yīng)硬盤的物理扇區(qū)位置了。

再說一下submit_bio，

我們可以自己構(gòu)建一個(gè)bio，然后調(diào)用submit_bio去直接對block設(shè)備讀取或者寫入數(shù)據(jù)，特別要注意的是，通過submit_bio出去的bio中的bi_sector是有可能會(huì)被改變的，如果操作的是分區(qū)，在真正提交到make_request_fn之前，會(huì)被加上該分區(qū)對應(yīng)的起始扇區(qū)的，特別需要注意。

看看源代碼，以2.6為例，注意黑體部分

void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio)
{
?? ?int count = bio_sectors(bio);

?? ?bio->bi_rw |= rw;

?? ?/*
?? ? * If it's a regular read/write or a barrier with data attached,
?? ? * go through the normal accounting stuff before submission.
?? ? */
?? ?if (bio_has_data(bio)) {
?? ??? ?if (rw & WRITE) {
?? ??? ??? ?count_vm_events(PGPGOUT, count);
?? ??? ?} else {
?? ??? ??? ?task_io_account_read(bio->bi_size);
?? ??? ??? ?count_vm_events(PGPGIN, count);
?? ??? ?}

?? ??? ?if (unlikely(block_dump)) {
?? ??? ??? ?char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
?? ??? ??? ?printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s(%d): %s block %Lu on %s\n",
?? ??? ??? ?current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
?? ??? ??? ??? ?(rw & WRITE) ? "WRITE" : "READ",
?? ??? ??? ??? ?(unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector,
?? ??? ??? ??? ?bdevname(bio->bi_bdev, b));
?? ??? ?}
?? ?}

?? ?generic_make_request(bio);
}

void generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
{
?? ?if (current->bio_tail) {
?? ??? ?/* make_request is active */
?? ??? ?*(current->bio_tail) = bio;
?? ??? ?bio->bi_next = NULL;
?? ??? ?current->bio_tail = &bio->bi_next;
?? ??? ?return;
?? ?}
?? ?/* following loop may be a bit non-obvious, and so deserves some
?? ? * explanation.
?? ? * Before entering the loop, bio->bi_next is NULL (as all callers
?? ? * ensure that) so we have a list with a single bio.
?? ? * We pretend that we have just taken it off a longer list, so
?? ? * we assign bio_list to the next (which is NULL) and bio_tail
?? ? * to &bio_list, thus initialising the bio_list of new bios to be
?? ? * added. ?__generic_make_request may indeed add some more bios
?? ? * through a recursive call to generic_make_request. ?If it
?? ? * did, we find a non-NULL value in bio_list and re-enter the loop
?? ? * from the top. ?In this case we really did just take the bio
?? ? * of the top of the list (no pretending) and so fixup bio_list and
?? ? * bio_tail or bi_next, and call into __generic_make_request again.
?? ? *
?? ? * The loop was structured like this to make only one call to
?? ? * __generic_make_request (which is important as it is large and
?? ? * inlined) and to keep the structure simple.
?? ? */
?? ?BUG_ON(bio->bi_next);
?? ?do {
?? ??? ?current->bio_list = bio->bi_next;
?? ??? ?if (bio->bi_next == NULL)
?? ??? ??? ?current->bio_tail = &current->bio_list;
?? ??? ?else
?? ??? ??? ?bio->bi_next = NULL;
?? ??? ?__generic_make_request(bio);
?? ??? ?bio = current->bio_list;
?? ?} while (bio);
?? ?current->bio_tail = NULL; /* deactivate */
}

static inline void __generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
{
?? ?struct request_queue *q;
?? ?sector_t old_sector;
?? ?int ret, nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
?? ?dev_t old_dev;
?? ?int err = -EIO;

?? ?might_sleep();

?? ?if (bio_check_eod(bio, nr_sectors))
?? ??? ?goto end_io;

?? ?/*
?? ? * Resolve the mapping until finished. (drivers are
?? ? * still free to implement/resolve their own stacking
?? ? * by explicitly returning 0)
?? ? *
?? ? * NOTE: we don't repeat the blk_size check for each new device.
?? ? * Stacking drivers are expected to know what they are doing.
?? ? */
?? ?old_sector = -1;
?? ?old_dev = 0;
?? ?do {
?? ??? ?char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];

?? ??? ?q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
?? ??? ?if (unlikely(!q)) {
?? ??? ??? ?printk(KERN_ERR
?? ??? ??? ? ? ? ? "generic_make_request: Trying to access "
?? ??? ??? ??? ?"nonexistent block-device %s (%Lu)\n",
?? ??? ??? ??? ?bdevname(bio->bi_bdev, b),
?? ??? ??? ??? ?(long long) bio->bi_sector);
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;
?? ??? ?}

?? ??? ?if (unlikely(!bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_DISCARD) &&
?? ??? ??? ? ? ? nr_sectors > queue_max_hw_sectors(q))) {
?? ??? ??? ?printk(KERN_ERR "bio too big device %s (%u > %u)\n",
?? ??? ??? ? ? ? ? bdevname(bio->bi_bdev, b),
?? ??? ??? ? ? ? ? bio_sectors(bio),
?? ??? ??? ? ? ? ? queue_max_hw_sectors(q));
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;
?? ??? ?}

?? ??? ?if (unlikely(test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags)))
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;

?? ??? ?if (should_fail_request(bio))
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;

?? ??? ?/*
?? ??? ? * If this device has partitions, remap block n
?? ??? ? * of partition p to block n+start(p) of the disk.
?? ??? ? */
?? ??? ?blk_partition_remap(bio);

?? ??? ?if (bio_integrity_enabled(bio) && bio_integrity_prep(bio))
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;

?? ??? ?if (old_sector != -1)
?? ??? ??? ?trace_block_remap(q, bio, old_dev, old_sector);

?? ??? ?old_sector = bio->bi_sector;
?? ??? ?old_dev = bio->bi_bdev->bd_dev;

?? ??? ?if (bio_check_eod(bio, nr_sectors))
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;

?? ??? ?if (bio_rw_flagged(bio, BIO_RW_DISCARD) &&
?? ??? ? ? ?!blk_queue_discard(q)) {
?? ??? ??? ?err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
?? ??? ??? ?goto end_io;
?? ??? ?}

?? ??? ?trace_block_bio_queue(q, bio);

?? ??? ?ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
?? ?} while (ret);

?? ?return;

end_io:
?? ?bio_endio(bio, err);
}

?

*
?* If bio->bi_dev is a partition, remap the location
?*/
static inline void blk_partition_remap(struct bio *bio)
{
?? ?struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev;

?? ?if (bio_sectors(bio) && bdev != bdev->bd_contains) {
?? ??? ?struct hd_struct *p = bdev->bd_part;

?? ??? ?bio->bi_sector += p->start_sect;
?? ??? ?bio->bi_bdev = bdev->bd_contains;

?? ??? ?trace_block_remap(bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev), bio,
?? ??? ??? ??? ? ? ?bdev->bd_dev,
?? ??? ??? ??? ? ? ?bio->bi_sector - p->start_sect);
?? ?}
}
?

總結(jié)

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的BIO bi_sector submit_bio make_request_fn的全部內(nèi)容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容還不錯(cuò)，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。