• EBS plus: S3 storage is more expensive. (0.15 $/Gb > 0.1$/Gb)

• S3 plus: Serving static files from EBS may influence my web server's performance negatively. Is this true? Does serving images affect a server performance notably? For S3, my server will not be responsible for serving static files.

• S3 plus: Serving static files from EBS may result in I/O cost, though it will probably be minor.

• EBS plus: People say EBS is faster.

• S3 plus: People say S3 is safer for persistence.

• EBS plus: There is no need to learn an API: it is straightforward to save the images to an EBS volume.

EBS：S3存儲更昂貴。（0.15美元/ GB > 0.1美元/ GB）
S3 +：從EBS服務靜態文件可能會負面影響我的Web服務器的性能。這是真的嗎？服務圖像會顯著影響服務器性能嗎？對于S3，我的服務器不負責運行靜態文件。
S3+：從EBS服務靜態文件可能導致I/O成本，雖然它可能是次要的。
EBS：人們說EBS更快。
S3 Plus：人們說S3對于持久性更安全。
EBS Plus：沒有必要學習API：將圖像保存到EBS卷中是很簡單的

總結

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的AWS Elastic Block Store和Simple Storage Services区别的全部內容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網站內容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。