日韩性视频-久久久蜜桃-www中文字幕-在线中文字幕av-亚洲欧美一区二区三区四区-撸久久-香蕉视频一区-久久无码精品丰满人妻-国产高潮av-激情福利社-日韩av网址大全-国产精品久久999-日本五十路在线-性欧美在线-久久99精品波多结衣一区-男女午夜免费视频-黑人极品ⅴideos精品欧美棵-人人妻人人澡人人爽精品欧美一区-日韩一区在线看-欧美a级在线免费观看

歡迎訪問 生活随笔!

生活随笔

當前位置: 首頁 > 编程资源 > 编程问答 >内容正文

编程问答

Best open-source pedestrian detection library for commercial use?

發布時間:2025/7/25 编程问答 23 豆豆
生活随笔 收集整理的這篇文章主要介紹了 Best open-source pedestrian detection library for commercial use? 小編覺得挺不錯的,現在分享給大家,幫大家做個參考.

Best open-source pedestrian detection library for commercial use?

asked?Aug 19 '15

Tommi?
21?2?3?7

Hi there,

I'm looking for the best real-time?image-based?people detection software that is available for commercial use, and easily integrated to ROS. So preferably C++ with a simple structure and clear documentation. I know the state-of-art in people detection; it's easily available from surveys, e.g.

What I would like to have is something similar to the algorithms marked M-Q in the image. However, all seem to be shared with a non-commercial license.

Here is what I've come up so far:

  • OpenCV HOG implementation as ROS package --?however, basic HOG is probably not very accuratehttps://github.com/angusleigh/hog_haa...
  • SPENCER implementation --?again, just basic HOG? Plus, it's an EU project.https://github.com/spencer-project/sp...
  • Munaro et al --?basic Haar & HOG?https://github.com/ros-industrial/hum...
  • As a bonus, a good tracker that is integrated with the detector would be nice, but not it's not required.

    Comments

    Can you comment on why you feel they "all seem to be shared with a non-commercial license"? Some open-source licenses explicitly allow commercial use, with just the requirement that you?mention?the use of the those libraries / dependencies. They don't require you to make your work open source.

    gvdhoorn?(Aug 24 '15)

    They explicitly mention that the code is shared for research use only.

    Tommi?(Aug 25 '15)

    All of them? Are these actual open-source licenses then?

    gvdhoorn?(Aug 25 '15) add a comment

    1 answer

    Sort by ?oldestnewestmost voted 1

    answered?Sep 14 '15

    Tommi?
    21?2?3?7

    I spent some time reading the FPDW and VeryFast papers. The conclusion is that they are mostly performance optimizations and small tweaks, while the fundamental detector is still HOG. Also, the classifier (SVM, NN, decision forest) does not make a huge difference. Therefore, I decided to go with HOG+SVM because it's fast and simple, and I found a good implementation from?http://dlib.net?. Example:http://blog.dlib.net/2014/02/dlib-186...?Dlib uses an improved version of HOG, by Felzenszwalb et al. Also, performance _should_ be better than OpenCV.

    link add a comment

    總結

    以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的Best open-source pedestrian detection library for commercial use?的全部內容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

    如果覺得生活随笔網站內容還不錯,歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。