龙芯3A5000LL与i7-10700的UnixBench跑分对比
生活随笔
收集整理的這篇文章主要介紹了
龙芯3A5000LL与i7-10700的UnixBench跑分对比
小編覺得挺不錯的,現在分享給大家,幫大家做個參考.
龍芯
架構： ? ? ? ? ? loongarch64
字節序： ? ? ? ? Little Endian
CPU: ? ? ? ? ? ? 4
在線 CPU 列表： ?0-3
每個核的線程數： 1
每個座的核數： ? 4
座： ? ? ? ? ? ? 1
NUMA 節點： ? ? ?1
CPU 系列： ? ? ? Loongson-64bit
型號名稱： ? ? ? Loongson-3A5000LL
BogoMIPS： ? ? ? 4600.00
L1d 緩存： ? ? ? 64K
L1i 緩存： ? ? ? 64K
L2 緩存： ? ? ? ?256K
L3 緩存： ? ? ? ?16384K
英特爾
架構： ? ? ? ?x86_64
處理器操作模式： ? ? ?32-bit, 64-bit
字節序： ? ? ? ? ?Little Endian
地址大小： ? ? ? 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
CPU： ? ? ? ? ? ? ?16
在線 CPU 列表： 0-15
每個核的線程數： ?2
每個座的核數： ?8
座： ? ? ? ? ? 1
NUMA 節點： ? ? ? ?1
Vendor ID： ? ? ? ? ? GenuineIntel
型號： ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 165
型號名稱： ? ? ? ? ?Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz
CPU MHz： ? ? ? ? ? ? 2900.000
CPU max MHz： ? ? ? ? 4800.0000
CPU min MHz： ? ? ? ? 800.0000
BogoMIPS： ? ? ? ? ? ?5799.77
虛擬化： ? ? ?VT-x
L1d 緩存： ? ? ? ? ? 32K
L1i 緩存： ? ? ? ? ? 32K
L2 緩存： ? ? ? ? ? ?256K
L3 緩存： ? ? ? ? ? ?16384K
龍芯跑分：
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 29466399.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3950.2 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4801.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 574277.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 154530.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1661865.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1112434.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 288865.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11881.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8327.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2704.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1217616.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29466399.7 2525.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3950.2 718.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4801.2 1116.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 574277.5 1450.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 154530.5 933.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1661865.0 2865.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1112434.3 894.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 288865.4 722.2
Process Creation 126.0 11881.8 943.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8327.0 1963.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2704.2 4507.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1217616.5 811.7========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1342.8------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 117353855.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 15802.3 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 17546.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 770178.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 200917.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2579517.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4430140.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1119742.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 42837.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20755.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2977.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4115032.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 117353855.4 10056.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15802.3 2873.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 17546.7 4080.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 770178.5 1944.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 200917.9 1214.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2579517.0 4447.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4430140.5 3561.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1119742.5 2799.4
Process Creation 126.0 42837.8 3399.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20755.5 4895.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2977.2 4962.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4115032.3 2743.4========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3445.2
i7-10700跑分：
16 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 59349705.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9540.0 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7200.7 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1613123.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 425426.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4720434.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2990172.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 308606.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15796.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18735.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 8475.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3500159.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 59349705.1 5085.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9540.0 1734.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 7200.7 1674.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1613123.6 4073.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 425426.4 2570.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4720434.2 8138.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2990172.7 2403.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 308606.1 771.5
Process Creation 126.0 15796.8 1253.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18735.9 4418.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 8475.1 14125.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3500159.7 2333.4========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2945.4------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 519769901.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 111240.3 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 47864.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1538356.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 397724.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4889086.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 21435187.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 3008238.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 102306.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 99855.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 12952.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 10496632.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 519769901.7 44539.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 111240.3 20225.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 47864.5 11131.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1538356.3 3884.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 397724.3 2403.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4889086.9 8429.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 21435187.2 17230.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 3008238.6 7520.6
Process Creation 126.0 102306.7 8119.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 99855.0 23550.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 12952.2 21587.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 10496632.4 6997.8========
System Benchmarks Index Score 10944.6
結果：
從跑分結果來看，目前龍芯的單核性能還不到10代i7的一半，多核性能就更羸弱了，在使用過程中也有相當程度的卡頓，龍芯還需要加油啊。
跑分結果僅供參考，如果以后遇到其他版本的龍芯接著測試。
總結
以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的龙芯3A5000LL与i7-10700的UnixBench跑分对比的全部內容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。
- 上一篇： 编写下载服务器。 第四部分：有效地实现H
- 下一篇： Java REST JAX-RS 2.0