這是cnbeta上今天的一條新聞

Secunia:殺毒軟件不安全 Redhat和FireFox漏洞多過微軟軟件

當(dāng)然，我等linuxer都知道，這又是一篇軟文。原文來自這里：

Secunia: More Red Hat flaws than Microsoft in 2007

ZDNet的妓者顯然取了一個非常具有誤導(dǎo)性的標(biāo)題，認(rèn)真看完這篇文章就知道，Secunia的報告根本沒有得出Windows比linux安全，ie比ff安全之類的結(jié)論，相反的，Secunia的CTO還在力挺linux:

"It's impossible to make a fair comparison--it's like comparing apples to oranges," Thomas Kristensen, Secunia's chief technology officer, told ZDNet.co.uk. "Red Hat has the highest number of applications included, so the number of vulnerabilities that affect it is bound to be higher."

"Web servers, database servers, archiving tools, office productivity suites--there's two of everything when it comes to Red Hat," said Kristensen. "Windows XP can only be used as a workstation. If you want to run XP as, say, a web server, you have to buy either Microsoft or third-party software."

Kristensen said that third-party software was a key factor affecting the number of vulnerabilities attributed to the respective operating systems. With Red Hat, 99 percent, or 629 of the vulnerabilities, were due to third-party components. With Windows, four percent of flaws were due to third-party software.

可悲的是，這個時代的人們往往閱讀一個標(biāo)題就了事了。ZDNet的妓者顯然深諳此道，不過他還算有良心，文章寫的四平八穩(wěn)還算公正，cnbeta的翻譯稿純粹就是斷章取義了，用心何在？說他一句沒有職業(yè)道德一點兒也不過分。

可笑的是，cnbeta的新聞一出，下面就有兩方在對罵了，有時間對罵沒時間自己去求證一下么？顯然，謾罵已經(jīng)成為國內(nèi)民眾最喜愛的娛樂活動之一。最令人哭笑不得的是，總有人要拿著這種不是證據(jù)的新聞當(dāng)證據(jù)，跳到我面前來說，linux不好，firefox不好。我懶得理他懶了999次，今天實在受不了了，發(fā)文紀(jì)念一下。...

總結(jié)

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的三人成虎的全部內(nèi)容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。