JPEG最优压缩参数试验【光影魔术手VS Image Optimizer】
生活随笔
收集整理的這篇文章主要介紹了
JPEG最优压缩参数试验【光影魔术手VS Image Optimizer】
小編覺得挺不錯的,現在分享給大家,幫大家做個參考.
| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| ? | 樣本數量:100張(1MB~2.6MB)旅游照 | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | 樣本大小:157MB | 156.44? | ? | ||||||||||||||
| ? | 樣本尺寸:3M(2048*1536) | 3145728 | ? | ||||||||||||||
| ? | 分辨率值:72dpi | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||
| ? | 位每像素:5.2083 | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||
| ? | 位深度值:24 | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||
| ? | 色彩標準:sRGB | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | 統一要求:保留EXIF信息(刪除可減小約20KB) | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | 比對工具:Beyond Compare V3.3.4.14431 | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | 比對方法:比對每種配置壓縮產生的“重要差異像素”數量,越小越好! | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | 容差閥值:使用PS另存為品質最佳12的JPEG格式,與原圖對比,當容差為N時剛好不出現“重要差異像素”。 | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | Image OptimizerPro V5.10 6010 | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | JPEG質量 | 1% | 1% | 1% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 100% | 90% | 80% | ? | ||||
| ? | 魔法壓縮 | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ? | ||||
| ? | 從文件讀取質量 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| ? | 壓縮后大小(MB) | 138.98? | 67.16? | 53.25? | 57.68? | 36.42? | 27.92? | 22.75? | 19.81? | 90.49? | 31.34? | 22.75? | ? | ||||
| ? | 減小(百分比) | 11.16% | 57.07% | 65.96% | 63.13% | 76.72% | 82.15% | 85.46% | 87.34% | 42.16% | 79.97% | 85.46% | ? | ||||
| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| ? | CIMG0027:容差14 | 1,657? | 18,287? | 47,960? | 31,028? | 96,306? | 156,854? | 217,155? | 272,750? | 1,304? | 162,805? | 265,269? | ? | ||||
| ? | CIMG0024:容差15 | 73? | 675? | 1,463? | 1,150? | 2,972? | 4,939? | 7,526? | 10,360? | 90? | 4,644? | 8,605? | ? | ||||
| ? | CIMG9979:容差14 | 61? | 698? | 1,592? | 1,566? | 5,045? | 8,859? | 13,620? | 18,690? | 74? | 6,178? | 12,581? | ? | ||||
| ? | 總差異像素 | 1,791? | 19,660? | 51,015? | 33,744? | 104,323? | 170,652? | 238,301? | 301,800? | 1,468? | 173,627? | 286,455? | ? | ||||
| ? | 差異(百分比擴大45倍) | 0.8540% | 9.3746% | 24.3258% | 16.0904% | 49.7451% | 81.3732% | 113.6308% | 143.9095% | 0.7000% | 82.7918% | 136.5924% | ? | ||||
| ? | 參考權值(越大越好) | 10.31% | 47.69% | 41.64% | 47.04% | 26.98% | 0.78% | -28.18% | -56.57% | 41.46% | -2.82% | -51.14% | ? | ||||
| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | 光影魔術手 V3.1.2.103 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | |||||||||||
| ? | JPEG質量 | 90% | 90% | 80% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 75% | 78% | 79% | 81% | 82% | 83% |
| ? | 高質量輸出 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| ? | 壓縮后大小(MB) | 65.98? | 55.97? | 41.21? | 35.79? | 32.74? | 28.08? | 27.65? | 23.46? | 24.60? | 20.70? | 36.01? | 39.45? | 40.23? | 43.31? | 44.30? | 46.55? |
| ? | 減小(百分比) | 57.83% | 64.22% | 73.66% | 77.12% | 79.07% | 82.05% | 82.32% | 85.00% | 84.28% | 86.77% | 76.98% | 74.78% | 74.29% | 72.31% | 71.68% | 70.24% |
| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| ? | CIMG0027:容差14 | 2,751? | 30,819? | 21,674? | 96,037? | 47,797? | 157,168? | 76,995? | 216,996? | 110,145? | 271,171? | 35,042? | 26,506? | 24,396? | 19,088? | 17,105? | 14,692? |
| ? | CIMG0024:容差15 | 126? | 1,203? | 779? | 3,151? | 1,592? | 5,052? | 2,770? | 7,688? | 4,352? | 10,518? | 1,217? | 891? | 849? | 651? | 567? | 496? |
| ? | CIMG9979:容差14 | 269? | 1,640? | 1,517? | 5,203? | 3,417? | 9,029? | 5,871? | 13,909? | 8,786? | 18,989? | 2,523? | 1,889? | 1,774? | 1,436? | 1,294? | 1,150? |
| ? | 總差異像素 | 3,146? | 33,662? | 23,970? | 104,391? | 52,806? | 171,249? | 85,636? | 238,593? | 123,283? | 300,678? | 38,782? | 29,286? | 27,019? | 21,175? | 18,966? | 16,338? |
| ? | 差異(百分比擴大45倍) | 1.5001% | 16.0513% | 11.4298% | 49.7775% | 25.1799% | 81.6579% | 40.8344% | 113.7700% | 58.7859% | 143.3744% | 18.4927% | 13.9647% | 12.8837% | 10.0970% | 9.0437% | 7.7906% |
| ? | 參考權值(越大越好) | 56.32% | 48.17% | 62.23% | 27.35% | 53.89% | 0.39% | 41.49% | -28.77% | 25.49% | -56.61% | 58.49% | 60.82% | 61.40% | 62.22% | 62.64% | 62.45% |
| ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | 如果相同配置壓縮同一組照片,壓縮出來的照片MD5不一樣,即存在壓縮噪點。經過測試,不會出現這種情況。比對不同軟件壓縮質量時,不用考慮壓縮噪點問題。 | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | 結論:使用光影魔術手的80~85%高質量輸出的壓縮配置是當前最優選擇。 | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||
| ? | By:AsionTang | ? | |||||||||||||||
| ? | DT:2013年6月16日 21:31:36 | ? | |||||||||||||||
轉載于:https://www.cnblogs.com/AsionTang/p/3139416.html
總結
以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的JPEG最优压缩参数试验【光影魔术手VS Image Optimizer】的全部內容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。
- 上一篇: 高斯函数参考
- 下一篇: python笔记本电脑推荐2020_20