白话Elasticsearch16-深度探秘搜索技术之使用原生cross-fiedls技术解决搜索弊端
文章目錄
- 概述
- 例子
概述
繼續(xù)跟中華石杉老師學(xué)習(xí)ES,第15篇
課程地址: https://www.roncoo.com/view/55
白話(huà)Elasticsearch14-基于multi_match 使用most_fields策略進(jìn)行cross-fields search弊端
白話(huà)Elasticsearch15-使用copy_to定制組合field解決cross-fields搜索弊端
承接上兩篇, 接下來(lái)看下如何使用原生cross-fiels技術(shù)解決搜索的弊端
例子
使用DSL如下,可以解決 "operator": "and",
GET /forum/article/_search {"query": {"multi_match": {"query": "Peter Smith","type": "cross_fields", "operator": "and","fields": ["author_first_name", "author_last_name"]}} }返回結(jié)果:
{"took": 3,"timed_out": false,"_shards": {"total": 1,"successful": 1,"skipped": 0,"failed": 0},"hits": {"total": 2,"max_score": 2.3258216,"hits": [{"_index": "forum","_type": "article","_id": "1","_score": 2.3258216,"_source": {"articleID": "XHDK-A-1293-#fJ3","userID": 1,"hidden": false,"postDate": "2017-01-01","tag": ["java","hadoop"],"tag_cnt": 2,"view_cnt": 30,"title": "this is java and elasticsearch blog","content": "i like to write best elasticsearch article","sub_title": "learning more courses","author_first_name": "Peter","author_last_name": "Smith","new_author_last_name": "Smith","new_author_first_name": "Peter"}},{"_index": "forum","_type": "article","_id": "5","_score": 1.7770995,"_source": {"articleID": "DHJK-B-1395-#Ky5","userID": 3,"hidden": false,"postDate": "2019-05-01","tag": ["elasticsearch"],"tag_cnt": 1,"view_cnt": 10,"title": "this is spark blog","content": "spark is best big data solution based on scala ,an programming language similar to java","sub_title": "haha, hello world","author_first_name": "Tonny","author_last_name": "Peter Smith","new_author_last_name": "Peter Smith","new_author_first_name": "Tonny"}}]} }那是如何解決cromss fields的弊端的呢? 我們來(lái)分析下
-
問(wèn)題1:只是找到盡可能多的field匹配的doc,而不是某個(gè)field完全匹配的doc
答: 解決,要求每個(gè)term都必須在任何一個(gè)field中出現(xiàn)
Peter,Smith
要求Peter必須在author_first_name或author_last_name中出現(xiàn)
要求Smith必須在author_first_name或author_last_name中出現(xiàn)Peter Smith可能是橫跨在多個(gè)field中的,所以必須要求每個(gè)term都在某個(gè)field中出現(xiàn),組合起來(lái)才能組成我們想要的標(biāo)識(shí),完整的人名
原來(lái)most_fiels,可能像Smith Williams也可能會(huì)出現(xiàn),因?yàn)閙ost_fields要求只是任何一個(gè)field匹配了就可以,匹配的field越多,分?jǐn)?shù)越高
- 問(wèn)題2:most_fields,沒(méi)辦法用minimum_should_match去掉長(zhǎng)尾數(shù)據(jù),就是匹配的特別少的結(jié)果 --> 解決,既然每個(gè)term都要求出現(xiàn),長(zhǎng)尾肯定被去除掉了
答:java hadoop spark --> 這3個(gè)term都必須在任何一個(gè)field出現(xiàn)了
比如有的document,只有一個(gè)field中包含一個(gè)java,那就被干掉了,作為長(zhǎng)尾就沒(méi)了
- 問(wèn)題3:TF/IDF算法,比如Peter Smith和Smith Williams,搜索Peter Smith的時(shí)候,由于first_name中很少有Smith的,所以query在所有document中的頻率很低,得到的分?jǐn)?shù)很高,可能Smith Williams反而會(huì)排在Peter Smith前面
答:計(jì)算IDF的時(shí)候,將每個(gè)query在每個(gè)field中的IDF都取出來(lái),取最小值,就不會(huì)出現(xiàn)極端情況下的極大值了
Peter Smith
Peter
Smith
Smith,在author_first_name這個(gè)field中,在所有doc的這個(gè)Field中,出現(xiàn)的頻率很低,導(dǎo)致IDF分?jǐn)?shù)很高;Smith在所有doc的author_last_name field中的頻率算出一個(gè)IDF分?jǐn)?shù),因?yàn)橐话銇?lái)說(shuō)last_name中的Smith頻率都較高,所以IDF分?jǐn)?shù)是正常的,不會(huì)太高;然后對(duì)于Smith來(lái)說(shuō),會(huì)取兩個(gè)IDF分?jǐn)?shù)中,較小的那個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)。就不會(huì)出現(xiàn)IDF分過(guò)高的情況。
總結(jié)
以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的白话Elasticsearch16-深度探秘搜索技术之使用原生cross-fiedls技术解决搜索弊端的全部?jī)?nèi)容,希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問(wèn)題。
- 上一篇: 白话Elasticsearch15-深度
- 下一篇: 白话Elasticsearch17-深度